As a clinician, I spend a lot of time teaching people how to find their voice. For people-pleasers, over-functioners, and chronic “shrinkers,” this work is necessary, a part of the life mission we must face; otherwise we risk being a drifter in the loop. Many of us were conditioned to make ourselves smaller in order to maintain peace in relationships. As a result, learning how to speak up, set boundaries, and advocate for ourselves becomes a crucial developmental step in reclaiming agency.

But—big but… there is a side of this conversation that rarely gets explored.

Sometimes the pendulum swings too far in the other direction. The person who once struggled to speak at all can move into a state where they feel the need to respond to everything. Every interaction becomes something to analyze, challenge, or defend against. At that point, speaking up stops being an act of sovereignty and starts becoming a symptom of an unregulated nervous system. Think rescue dog that is afraid of a bag blowing in the wind. It’s not scared of a bag? It just has to learn the rhythm of the wind. When the nervous system is stuck in what I call the Activated Survival Self (ASS), it stops behaving like a calm observer of reality and starts acting more like a narrative architect. It begins scanning the environment for threats the same way a safari guide scans the horizon for lions or the way a sniper stays locked in searching for the target. The problem is that when the nervous system has been trained to expect danger everywhere, it will often begin painting lions onto the faces of people who were simply walking through the grass. In other words, if the brain expects danger and cannot find it, it may start inventing it. Creating it out of thin air because, sitting in the truth that it was just a mirage created by their own internal world. That would require self-ownership, accountability of the untrained stallion of the mind and nervous system. Work that belongs to them that they have neglected.

This is how the reactivity trap forms. People move from people-pleasing into advocating, but the shift overshoots the mark and lands in hyper-defensiveness. When every bag blowing in the wind feels like a threat, you are no longer practicing advocacy—you are living as a hostage to hyper-vigilance. A large part of this process happens through the lenses we wear in our minds. Psychology calls these lenses schemas. Schemas are mental templates built through past experiences that shape how we interpret the present moment. They help the brain make quick sense of the world, but they also have a powerful bias built into them.

If you are wearing red glasses, everything looks red.

If someone enters a workplace already carrying the schema that “people here are judging me,” their brain will automatically filter the environment through that expectation. The colleague who admires their work becomes invisible. The neutral facial expression becomes suspicious. The person who didn’t hold the elevator suddenly becomes proof that the environment is hostile. What we are witnessing in those moments is confirmation bias amplified by the amygdala. The brain’s threat detection system is wired to notice anything that confirms its predictions while ignoring evidence that contradicts them. Neuroscientists call this predictive processing, where the brain constantly uses past experiences to guess what is happening in the present moment (Barrett, 2017). So basically, in Sav language. We are sitting in the hippocampus archives projecting the collection of events we find in there onto the environment and people in it. Painting the faces onto the lions.

Share

When the nervous system is activated, the brain doesn’t just observe reality. It begins directing a movie about it. Our committee in our minds (think inside out) They are up there directing each scene. This is where energy begins to leak into the environment in ways people rarely realize. Human beings are extremely sensitive to emotional signals. Research on emotional contagion shows that we unconsciously mirror one another’s physiological states through subtle cues like posture, tone, and facial expression. If someone enters a room carrying the energy of suspicion or defense, other nervous systems pick up on it immediately.

You cannot emit the frequency of “stay away from me” and then feel confused when people keep their distance.

When others sense that guarded energy, they often respond by giving space. But here is the painful irony of our human behavior. The ASS interprets that distance not as respect for a boundary, but as confirmation of rejection or prejudice. In that moment a feedback loop is created (schema). The person’s hyper-vigilance pushes people away, and the resulting distance becomes proof that their fears were justified. What started as a protective strategy ends up creating the very isolation the person was afraid of.

I see this dynamic appear it’s pesky head across cultural lines as well. Whether the narrative is built around race, gender, class, or social status, there is a human tendency to turn entire groups into symbolic stand-ins for personal insecurity. It is far easier for the mind to say, “They are the problem,” than it is to acknowledge that the nervous system itself may be overwhelmed. True psychological resilience involves the ability to pause long enough to question the story the mind is telling. Sometimes the person in front of you is simply another human being with their own internal world. Sometimes the reaction you are feeling is less about the present moment and more about a memory archive your nervous system has not yet processed.

The hippocampus is basically the archive center. It stores past experiences that the amygdala then uses to detect potential threats in the environment. Imagine opening a memory box of picture all holding the image of painful events “imprints” from your time line. We basically throw those events onto the present moment. When those memories are unresolved, the brain can begin projecting old pain onto new situations. What feels like an immediate reaction to the present moment is often the nervous system sitting inside of that memory box. In psychology, this process is closely related to projection and cognitive distortions. Mind-reading, for example, occurs when we assume we know what another person is thinking without actual evidence. Labeling occurs when we assign a global negative trait to someone or an entire group based on limited information. Both distortions simplify the world into easy categories so the brain can feel more in control of uncertainty.

Stephen Porges’ Polyvagal Theory also helps explain this phenomenon through the concept of neuroception, the nervous system’s unconscious ability to detect safety or threat. When someone has experienced repeated trauma or exclusion, their safety meter can become miscalibrated. A neutral glance can register as hostility. A moment of silence can feel like rejection.

Pause for a moment.

As a multicultural woman, the situation I see A LOT is the concept of white people being unsafe. Since being back in California visiting. If I had a dollar for every time I heard “ugh they are so racist.” It drives me bonkers because how the hell do you know that simply by walking past a person who looks different than you? It’s such a statement of ignorance and reveals your ASS. White people have become the scapegoat for many people and their own unhealed and unacknowledged fears. Fears that quite frankly are being perpetuated by the media. How will you feel safe with people who do not look like you if all you ever do is hang around sameness? How are we so entitled to demand grace for our fear of coming out of our comfort zone. Yet, do not extend that grace outwardly? How can you come in with an energy of judgment, emit that outwardly than snap at people for becoming tense around you? Feels like waking on eggshell energy and I wonder how many of use feel that way.

If the ASS inside say “yeah but white people—-” shhhhhhh inner child, what has a white person done to you that you are not already doing to yourself?

The nervous system reacts before the thinking mind has time to investigate.

Over time, if someone only spends time with people who reinforce their existing worldview, this hyper-vigilance never gets challenged. Social psychologists refer to this as the absence of intergroup contact, a concept first studied by Gordon Allport. His research showed that meaningful interactions between different groups significantly reduce prejudice and fear. When we remain in self-segregated environments, the nervous system never has the opportunity to retrain itself to feel safe around difference. This contagion even impacts people within the white community. As someone who is white, black, and Native America (Muscogee 🥰) I have seen it with my family. Those who are white no longer feel safe around people who look like them. This is due to the need to feel belonging with their family and if they have family that are POC they choose to belong there and adopt the schema of that group whatever that is.

Many times I believe, the judgment we feel is really just the vulnerability of feeling naked— being in a different environment and around difference. That naked feeling goes away the more we practice and train the nervous system to learn there is no threat around difference.

Avoidance keeps the schema alive.

This is why developing discernment is so important in psychological growth. Advocacy and awareness are essential, but they must be balanced with curiosity and self-reflection. Otherwise, the brain’s survival system can quietly transform into a narrative machine that interprets every ambiguous interaction as confirmation of danger. That’s exhausting for you. When that happens, the world begins to look like a field full of lions—even when most of the people walking through it are just trying to get through their day. A simple practice can help interrupt this pattern. Before reacting or “calling something out,” pause long enough to perform what I call a reality audit. First, notice what is happening in your body. Are your shoulders tight? Is your chest constricted? Is your mind racing ahead of the evidence? Naming the sensation helps bring the nervous system back into awareness. You can name it… “Ahh the ASS is online…”

Next, identify the story your brain is telling. What assumption are you making about the other person’s intentions? Once the story is clear, challenge it by imagining at least three alternative explanations for the situation. (if your mind rejects those truths, note that down, you just discovered the entrance into your limiting belief realm. Understanding that perhaps the person is curious rather than judgmental. Perhaps they are distracted by something happening in their own life. Perhaps they admire you and simply feel intimidated. There are so many other possibilities besides… “they’re a racist, they're phobic, they are jealous.”

Finally, take a slow breath and consciously soften the defensive posture your body may be holding. Allow yourself to make brief eye contact without the shield of assumption. This is softening the field allowing yourself to be seen as the softer you and not the hypervigilent ASS. Often the “lion” that seemed so threatening disappears once the nervous system stops projecting the content of the hippocampus archives onto the people in the environment. None of this means ignoring real prejudice or injustice. Those realities exist and deserve to be addressed with clarity and courage. But psychological maturity requires the ability to differentiate between what is happening in the present moment and what the nervous system is replaying from the past. What is real injustice, and what’s truly you creating injustice for yourself by disconnecting you from connection.

If we never learn to question the stories our survival system tells us, we risk becoming people who judge others before we truly know them. In that moment, the lion we were so certain was standing in front of us may have been something we painted there ourselves.

Let me know what came up for you with this time.

I love seeing your comments, your shares of what was challenging. Thank you all for sitting in the muck with me. My heart is so full 🥰

Till next time.

Come as you are where you are.

References & Further Reading

For readers who want to explore the psychology and neuroscience concepts referenced in this essay, the following works provide foundational research and accessible explanations of how the nervous system, perception, and social cognition shape human behavior.

Predictive Processing & Constructed Emotion

Barrett, Lisa Feldman. (2017).
How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Barrett’s work explains how the brain constantly predicts what is happening in the present moment using past experiences stored in memory. Rather than reacting purely to the external world, the brain constructs emotional experiences based on prior learning, which helps explain why unresolved memories can shape how we interpret people and situations.

Extended Reading

Barrett, Lisa Feldman. (2020).
Seven and a Half Lessons About the Brain.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

A shorter and very accessible explanation of predictive brain theory and how perception is shaped by prior experience.

Polyvagal Theory & Neuroception

Porges, Stephen W. (2011).
The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation.
W. W. Norton & Company.

Porges introduces the concept of neuroception, the nervous system’s unconscious process of detecting safety or danger. When this system becomes dysregulated due to trauma or chronic stress, neutral interactions can be perceived as threats.

Extended Reading

Porges, Stephen W. & Dana, Deb. (2018).
Clinical Applications of the Polyvagal Theory.
W. W. Norton & Company.

Provides practical applications of polyvagal theory in therapy, trauma recovery, and nervous system regulation.

Cognitive Distortions & Schema Theory

Young, Jeffrey E., Klosko, Janet S., & Weishaar, Marjorie E. (2003).
Schema Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide.
Guilford Press.

This book outlines how early life experiences create schemas, or mental templates that shape how individuals interpret relationships, safety, and belonging. Schemas influence perception, often operating outside of conscious awareness.

Extended Reading

Beck, Aaron T. (1976).
Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders.
Penguin Books.

Beck’s foundational work on cognitive distortions explains mechanisms such as mind-reading, labeling, and confirmation bias, which influence how people interpret social interactions.

Emotional Contagion & Social Signal Transmission

Hatfield, Elaine, Cacioppo, John T., & Rapson, Richard L. (1993).
Emotional Contagion.
Cambridge University Press.

This research explores how human beings unconsciously mirror each other’s emotional and physiological states through facial expression, posture, tone, and subtle cues. Emotional states can spread through social environments without conscious awareness.

Intergroup Contact Theory

Allport, Gordon W. (1954).
The Nature of Prejudice.
Addison-Wesley.

Allport’s work introduced Intergroup Contact Theory, which demonstrates that meaningful interaction between members of different groups significantly reduces prejudice and fear. Avoidance and social segregation tend to reinforce stereotypes and perceived threat.

Extended Reading

Pettigrew, Thomas F., & Tropp, Linda R. (2006).
A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

This large-scale study confirms that intergroup contact consistently reduces prejudice across cultures and social contexts.

Fear Learning & the Threat Detection System

LeDoux, Joseph. (1996).
The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life.
Simon & Schuster.

LeDoux’s work explains how the amygdala processes threat and fear, often reacting before conscious thought has time to evaluate a situation.

Extended Reading

Sapolsky, Robert M. (2017).
Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst.
Penguin Press.

A comprehensive look at how biology, culture, and environment shape human behavior, including threat perception, bias, and group dynamics.

Trauma, Perception & Nervous System Conditioning

Maté, Gabor. (2022).
The Myth of Normal: Trauma, Illness, and Healing in a Toxic Culture.
Avery.

Maté explores how trauma and social environments shape nervous system responses, influencing perception, health, and relational behavior.

Extended Reading

van der Kolk, Bessel. (2014).
The Body Keeps the Score.
Penguin Books.

Explains how trauma becomes encoded in the nervous system and body, affecting perception, emotional regulation, and interpersonal relationships.

Additional Psychological Foundations

Kahneman, Daniel. (2011).
Thinking, Fast and Slow.
Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman’s work explains cognitive shortcuts and biases that shape human decision-making and perception.

If You Want to Explore This Topic Further

If this essay resonated with you, the areas of psychology worth exploring include:

• Predictive Brain Theory

• Polyvagal Theory

• Schema Therapy

• Cognitive Distortions

• Intergroup Contact Theory

• Trauma and Nervous System Regulation

• Social Signal Transmission and Emotional Contagion

Each of these frameworks contributes to understanding how the human brain interprets safety, threat, and social relationships.

The key takeaway across all of them is simple but profound: The brain does not simply observe reality. It interprets it through memory, expectation, and nervous system state. Sometimes, the lions we see in the field are not actually there.

Sometimes they are projections from the archive we carry within us.

How come humans today can’t have conversations? Just say what they feel? Mean what they say? We can’t make statements to what is true for our own lived experience anymore. Losing out on flavor for this world.

Why?

I have come to believe it’s due to the fear of someone else implying a meaning behind what is true for us. That then meaning is defended against by that very individual who demands you be accountable. Remember, accountable for what? What did you do besides express what is true for you? The meaning they made with your truth became what they punish YOU for..

Let that sink in for a moment.

We as a species do not feel safe to communicate with each other. Language, the very ability that makes us vibrant beings…It vanishes... We tiptoe, bite our tongue—Swallow… We have been conditioned to believe. Speak and you risk being punished for not being in sameness as the rest of the group. You get called labels. These are really glorified rumination loops of people who never trained the stallion of their mind to…Settle. Down.

Is the world ugly. yes

Is there injustice? yes

But riddle me this.

What are we doing in the mind with what we see in the world?

How often do we reflect on our own mind activity and whether it is being casted on to others as definitive truth because we “feel that way?”

Disagree = you must be a racist?

Really? or is that your protector part holding the mic?

The polarity is so extreme I can’t help but scream to myself.

How is this not a Cluster B crisis.

HOW CAN THE COLLECTIVE NOT SEE IT?

I feel these days some conversations are bait traps for people — tests to see how far someone can push you. You can pick this data clue up in the tone: hostile, instigative, agreeable but clearly from an ulterior motive or agenda. This energy is not pure. This energy is what dictates the emotional climate so the collective can’t reach each other. Can’t speak.

It mixes with the wounds from past lovers, caregivers, friends.

I have seen it in the way strangers comment to strangers online, responding as if the other person’s words, work, performance, etc., is a direct attack against them. Because their amygdala sees the ghost of what really wounded them, not what is actually happening. Many of us never sit with those wounds, which makes it easier to cast that part onto others.

One truth I have known to realize through my work with others.

Most of us have our heads so far up our own ass to make things a personal attack against others intentionally. Majority of us are stuck trying to untangle the loops in our own mind.

Till next time

🫶🏽

See you in the next one data collectors.

I want to start of by saying this topic was inspired by a safari member of ours who wrote into my DM with a very amazing question. I want to share it with you but I will protect the identity of the person.

What you read below is based of this response.

Are we ready?

Let’s get into it.

The Mirror of Fear: The Anxious, The Avoidant, and the Gap Between

“Allowing someone to pass” I love this. This right here is radical acceptance. Is this easy to practice? Not in the slightest. Especially, in a society today that is conditioning narcissistic and borderline personality traits in people who need their wounds named in order to be safe. No.

The reason this work is not easy is because the oppositional force to healing is resistance and well— resistance is being conditioned pavlovian style in the micro (us). The resistance to accountability, responsibility, and ownership of where you are NOW, instead of pointing the finger at the elders or parents who have harmed us.

To me, “letting someone pass” is an act of unconditional love for yourself. It’s the visceral realization that if someone insists the sky is green, you don’t have to litigate the blue. You don’t have to prove, you don’t have to fix, and you don’t have to convince them of anything. Zoom out…

Haven’t you noticed. We are nothing but beings stuck in loops of feeling “not good enough” “not worthy enough.” So we over perform, over function, or over induldge to cope with the pain of “not being enough.” We’ve become a society that is constantly “proving” ourselves at work, in our families, and in our relationships. We are bleeding out our life force energy trying to be “seen” by people who won’t ever notice us because they are just a reenactment of a lesson we needed to learn, maybe 5 years ago so we can finally ascend.

Think of it like Iyanla Vanzant’s In the Meantime— if we are starting in the basement, the goal is to move up the floors. We can’t do that if we’re weighted down by litigation. "That policing behvaior that came from a whole year of being stuck at home in isolation with hysteria fill and a sickness that was infecting everyone. Was it COVID or was it this very emotional contagion? thats up for you to reflect on. Look at the psychological implications of what happens to humans when stuck inside fo far too long?

The birth of:

Hall Monitors,

“You aren’t politically correct” police

What society calls “Karens”

Don’t be fooled. These hall monitors, mob mentality members are the ones who have no control in their own life so they are out in the world controlling others. This provides the mob mentality member (we have all been there by the way) an escape into the illusion of control, so it can distract them from their own internal feelings of hopelessness.

See the loop?

If I can correct you I get dopamine. Now we have a bunch of dopamine addicted hall monitors running the streets instead of policing their own habits, routines, and mental health.

If someone wants to be wrong, let them. That’s the “Let Them” theory in action. When we are actually at peace within ourselves, we don’t need to control the external environment or the people in it. We can just allow them to be exactly where they are.

What will you do with all that extra time from hall monituring it up? OMG, maybe you can get to that walk you have been wanting to do for age, or make some bread, watch that show you wanted to…

Time becomes available when the mind is not fixated on the behavioral change others will not do. Focusing on them while you do not do what you could be doing is the hypocrisy loop we don’t see.

The Shadow of Survival: Identification with the Aggressor

Now, let’s zoom back in.

We point a lot at the older generation, but lets remind ourselves they still raised us. What survival adaptations did we inherit simply for being in proximity to them?

This is self-assessment.

We often identify as victims of communal narcissism, but we rarely discuss the Narcissistic Survival Adaptations (NSA) we adopted to endure it.

• Identification with the Aggressor: This Freudian concept explains how a child adopts the traits of a controlling caregiver to feel a sense of power rather than helplessness.

• Proximity as Leverage: We may find ourselves using proximity to a partner’s internal world as a way to bend or influence them—the very habit used against us as children.

Let’s unpack the last one because I myself have had experiences where that very proximity leverage has been used against me in friendships with women. These women are typically the ones that dictate emotional climates within their own family. I correlated some of the harm done to me by being a people pleaser. Now, Some people get close boucle they want to know the shadow aspects of you so they can feel better about themselves. This is very common. This Is where the need for discernment comes in.

The “Huge Child” and Arrested Development

Clinically, many adults we encounter (including ourselves) are functioning from a state of Developmental Arrest.

• The Puer/Puella Aeternus: These Jungian archetypes represent the “huge child” in an adult body someone who was never safely mirrored and thus never moved into functional adulthood.

• Adaptive Child vs. Functional Adult: Pia Mellody’s framework describes the “Adaptive Child” as the part of us that uses manipulation or control because it doesn’t believe in the safety of the “Functional Adult” boundary.

In Pia Mellody’s framework, this is the distinction between the Functional Adult and the Adaptive Child. When we are “allowing them to pass,” we are operating from the Adult; when we are trying to fix the external environment to feel safe, we are operating from the Child.

We cannot complete our missions in life from the operation of the child.

In this section of your Field Notes, we’re looking at the hard truth of the “Mission Block.” If you’re stuck in the Adaptive Child loop, you aren’t just stressed you’re essentially “offline” drifting is what Napoleon Hill would call it from your own destiny. You can’t reach the higher floors if you’re busy fortifying the basement.

The Mission Block: Survival vs. Alignment

When you operate from the Adaptive Child, you are trapped in the Activated Survival Self. In this state, your nervous system is “firing and wiring” in a loop of hypervigilance. You think you’re in a place of power because you’re controlling the environment, but clinically, you’re just in a state of high-functioning panic. Over time this consistent exposure raises your baseline for functioning.

• The Amygdala Hijack: Your brain is stuck in a survival loop, which means you literally cannot access the Prefrontal Cortex, the part of you required for vision, mission, and long-term creation.

• The Alignment Problem: You cannot complete your mission in life from a survival state because your “authentic self” isn’t the one driving. The Adaptive Child is an expert at surviving the past, but it has no idea how to navigate the present.

• The Schema Trap: You can’t advance to the next mission if you’re still playing by the rules of the child’s schema. It’s like trying to run new software on an old, corrupted operating system.

Debunking the Myth: What is a “Functional Adult”?

I myself find myself looking for the “adult ADULTS” 😂 We’ve been sold a lie that being an “adult” means having a mortgage, a job, and “shoulding” yourself into submission. But as we see in the field, many of these “adults” are just huge children with bigger bank accounts, more toys, and kids.

In our work, Adulthood is not a chronological age; it is a regulated state.

1. Presence over Performance: A Functional Adult lives in the present moment, not the “In the Meantime” basement of past reenactments.

2. Internal Agency over External Control: An adult doesn’t need to “litigate the blue” because their reality isn’t up for debate. They have nothing to prove.

3. The Anchor: Adulthood is the ability to stay okay within yourself even when the external environment is falling apart or someone is insisting the sky is green.

4. Relational Equality: The adult operates from a place of “equal to”—not the “superiority” or “less than” dynamics that the Adaptive Child uses to feel safe.

The Ascension

If the goal is to move up the floors, the “Functional Adult” is the elevator. You have to be willing to sit in the neurosis of adulthood, the discomfort of not controlling others—so that you can finally have the energy to complete your mission.

Your mission requires your presence and the Adaptive Child is always somewhere else, trying to fix a past that’s already over.

The Adaptive Child: The Survival Expert

The Adaptive Child is the version of you that stepped in when the actual adults in the room were “huge children” themselves. It is a set of behaviors, thoughts, and feelings that you “adapted” to survive a communal system that wasn’t safe or sane.

• Motivation: The primary goal is control as a form of safety. If I can manipulate the environment or “fix” the narcissist, then I won’t be hurt.

• Behavioral Traits: This part is often “less than” or “superior to” others. It’s the part that engages in the “What About Me?” sticker behavior or uses proximity to influence others.

• Reality Perception: It sees things in polarities (black and white). It’s the part that feels a “Narcissistic Injury” when the world doesn’t name its pain.

• The “Fleas”: This is where we harbor our Identification with the Aggressor. We use the same controlling tactics we learned from the narcissist because, to the Adaptive Child, power is the only alternative to powerlessness.

The Functional Adult: The Grounded Anchor

The Functional Adult is the part of your psyche that lives in the present moment. It is the “you” that has moved up from the basement to the higher floors.

• Motivation: The goal is connection and self-regulation, not control.

• Behavioral Traits: It operates from a place of “equal to” others neither a victim nor a perpetrator. It recognizes that its value is inherent and doesn’t need to be proven or litigated.

• The “Let Them” Theory: The Functional Adult is the part that can “Allow Someone to Pass”. It understands that someone else’s insistence that “the sky is green” is a reflection of their developmental arrest, not a threat to the Adult’s reality.

• Boundaries: Instead of trying to change the other person (external control), the Functional Adult sets a boundary on what they are willing to tolerate (internal agency).

The Balancing Act in the Field

The “neurosis of being an adult” is that we are constantly toggling between these two. We go to work as the Functional Adult, but the moment a boss or a spouse triggers an old “narcissistic injury,” the Adaptive Child grabs the steering wheel.

The work of “ascending” is learning how to notice when the child is trying to “fix the environment” and gently bringing the functional adult back online to keep the Prefrontal Cortex from checking out.

The Cognitive Tax of the “Green Sky”

Every time you try to change someone else’s distorted reality, you are paying a Prefrontal Cortex (PFC) Tax.

• Amygdala Hijack: Arguing with a narcissist triggers your survival brain.

• Top-Down Regulation: “Allowing them to pass” is a conscious choice to keep your PFC online. If you spend your life “fixing” the narcissist, you develop a chronic mood that eventually becomes a temperament and a personality.

Conclusion

The balancing act is realizing that we only try to fix the environment when we are not okay within ourselves. When we lack internal agency, we resort to external control. The work is to move from External Control to Internal Sovereignty.

Your manipulation was once your medicine, but now it is your poison.

If you are waiting for the environment to change so that you can finally start your life, you are being held hostage by your own Adaptive Child. This part of you thinks that controlling the “green sky” is the path to power, but it’s actually the anchor keeping you stuck looping in the basement.

• The Adult Reality: Being a “Functional Adult” means realizing that your mission is independent of other people’s dysregulation.

• Radical Acceptance: When you stop litigating, you stop giving your power away to people who aren’t even in the room with you.

The Work: The next time you feel that pull to “fix” or “prove,” ask yourself: Am I trying to move up a floor, or am I just decorating the basement?

Let them pass, so you can finally arrive.

Let me know what comes up for you with this one. Thank you to the person who wrote in. ‘Allow them to Pass’ is my new Mantra 🥰

Till next time Data Collectors.

Reference List

• Dispenza, J. (2012). Breaking the habit of being yourself: How to lose your mind and create a new one. Hay House.

• Freud, A. (1936). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. International Universities Press.

• Jung, C. G. (1959). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Princeton University Press.

• Mellody, P. (1989). Facing codependence: What it is, where it comes from, how it sabotages our lives. Harper & Row.

• Schwartz, R. C. (2001). Introduction to the internal family systems model. Trailheads.

Before we begin, due to the society we live in and the amount of polarity and "whataboutme" toxin plaguing the planet.

Let’s ground in the reminder:

Think every time you plug your brain into the work. You are now in connection with yourself. We are all in the room—together. When those of you share, bear with me, okay? I love to see it. The gridlock moments, the frustrations, the realizations—the "shift" is what my clients have been collectively calling it. Sharing helps not just me, but those in the background silently watching, listening, and reading.

In my work with humans. Please trust me when I say:

As someone who has worked in many different settings living in El Paso has ignited a level of emotion in me for the clients I serve here. Let me be frank here (not sure why its frank, but thats for another day…)

For the women or men who have been harmed by family members who have engaged in SA acts, coercion acts etc. While their parents, family etc covered it up—kept it silent, and told their child to stay quiet about it. These cases always make me wonder why.

I bring that curiosity into the room.

For many, MANY, having these conversations is extremely uncomfortable. I mean, on the uncertainty scale you’re talking UN.CER.TAIN.TY… Are you catching what I’m throwing? This is scary for the generational roots of some of these families. I know we love the Costco style of things sometimes, but this work gets heavy. Especially if kids, or even the adults, fear that the family will collapse once they share the information or emotions that are heavy on their heart with the family.

What do you think the issue with this is, long term?

Keeping it a secret

Because over time keeping that secret is essentially the muscle you teach the family. Silence, Swallowing, aching alone. Can you imagine what little kids feel when their parents “don’t believe them” simply because believing them puts them at risk of danger.

Zoom Out…

This happens in the workplace all. the. time.

Can you imagine if you are navigating this in the workplace AND at home. Which one are you going to prioritize? Well if we look at the hierarchy of needs.

If your job is at risk, what provides your physiological needs: water, food, sleep, shelter? Your brain can only focus on those needs until you can achieve them. Now, see where "Love & Belonging" is on the image above? Many of our own parents, elders, colleagues, etc., choose belonging because their amygdala, just like ours—considers the concept of belonging a physiological safety need. It is the biggest threat to self. So much so, we lose track of ourselves and maybe can’t even hold a job, stable relationships, etc. The job represents a level of commitment that (like Leonardo DiCaprio and his dating age rules 🤭) some people cannot access or are unwilling to. This simply can be because the level of comfort associated with being committed to something, even a job, long-term is terrifying for some. "Am I going to be stuck here forever?"

Now, consider the concept Napoleon Hill coined as “drifting” from his book Outwitting the Devil. When we lose track of ourselves, sometimes we end up prioritizing relationships over our children. We prioritize ourselves over our children.

So, when we pick that need to belong. It could be belonging to a work system, it could be the feeling of needing to belong to a side (a parental side, a political side, a friends' side) that side could also be choosing the side of yourself. Every single one of those decisions is polarity, which we have to be careful of because the mind is sticky and rigid. If we train it to be consistently that way without adding the flavor of new ones, we are weakening our muscles of critical thinking and our ability to learn discernment. What ends up happening is we stretch our window of tolerance.

We stretch our window of tolerance.

Looking at the image below, being stretched into the different color zones. The red zone or the brown zone happens because the environment or other people are stretching you outside of what is the optimal arousal zone. The zone we want to aim for. Understand that even having days where we end up in the hyperarousal zones, but we make it back into the optimal arousal zone, those are still fantastic wins. If we have days where we're stuck in the hyperarousal zone, let's see if we can work on our level of metacognition here— so we can train our ability to notice when we drift into the red zones.

When we stretch our window of tolerance, we are basically telling our "little self" as we hammer that square peg into that round hole: "This is not sustainable for us." We say to the subconscious, "You can’t handle anything else but the pain and discomfort of this round hole we do not fit into." We dismiss our nervous system; we dismiss our resiliency of what we have already endured and survived; we dismiss our brain's magic ability to rewire. We keep hammering away, chipping at ourselves, not realizing the long-term effects this will have on our sticky little brain.

Teaching that silencing what happens is safer than speaking up is a lie. Also remember: every knowing being of what information is forced into silence, their body knows the lie it is holding. Think of the mind-body connection here. It almost makes us reflect on recent research by Dr. Michael Slepian (Columbia University), which has shifted our understanding of secrecy. It isn’t just the “hiding” that hurts; it is the cognitive load of living with the thought. We often talk about “carrying” a secret or “weighty” regret as if it’s just a metaphor, but the biology to that story tells a much grittier version.

When we hold onto a lie or a deep-seated regret, our brain doesn’t just store it in a quiet folder; it treats that information like a constant, low-grade threat. Dr. Michael Slepian (2019) found that the real damage of secrecy isn’t the “act of lying,” but the exhausting mental loop of thinking about it. This “cognitive load” keeps the body in a state of high alert, which eventually shows up physically.

Now, zoom out. Where are you looping in the same way, keeping you on high alert? Women? Many of us feel our partner needs to change his behavior, delete his socials, and do what you say in order for the relationship to be at “peace.”

Think of it as a "Body Tax." When you’re stuck in the Hyperarousal Zone the top part of Dr. Dan Siegel’s (2012) Window of Tolerance your nervous system is red-lining. You see this in the field as chronic jaw clenching, "mysterious" digestive flare-ups, and a heart rate that won’t settle down. I see it in my clients' sleep patterns, inflammation in the face, back pain, and irregular or missing cycles for women. Roese and Vohs (2012) point out that chronic regret acts like a glitching program in our hardware; we keep trying to "fix" the past, which spikes our cortisol and creates systemic inflammation. Essentially, if the mind refuses to process the pain or tell the truth, the body starts screaming through symptoms to get our attention. Do we listen? Probably as much as the parental wound listened to the little you…

As the saying goes, the body keeps the score.

Internalized Patriarchy Is a Survival Strategy

Now, one of the patterns I have been seeing and holding for many clients in this city. Across workplaces where men act inappropriately toward younger women, a consistent pattern appears again and again. There is almost always an elder woman in proximity to power who minimizes complaints, discourages reporting, reframes harm, or “handles it quietly.” She may scold the man privately. She may offer vague reassurance. She may advise the younger woman to “let it go,” to “be careful,” to not cause trouble. What she rarely does is confront the system or side publicly with the vulnerable.

Is this a coincidence?

I think it’s conditioning.

Research in feminist psychology and sociology consistently shows that women who came of age in rigid patriarchal systems often internalize male-dominant norms as a means of survival rather than their true internal belief. Deniz Kandiyoti famously described this as "patriarchal bargaining"the unconscious negotiation women make to secure safety, resources, or status within male-dominated hierarchies. Um… Tyra Banks? Perfect example of that. Can we see how silent we as a collective get when the label of "villain" gets placed on someone that looks like you? Hmm… Now we start reaching for justifications. I call this the selective outrage.

For elder women, proximity to male authority often became the price of stability.

Speaking up historically meant:

• loss of income

• social exile

• retaliation

• moral condemnation

• or becoming the “difficult woman”

So silence became framed as a wisdom many chase and even are honored for. Endurance became framed as strength. Compliance became reframed as well…Maturity.

What do you think this does to the collectives sticky brains?

They adapt into the belief that compliance is safe and demanding it is the mature thing to do.

Why Younger Women Are More Threatening Than the Man Himself

From a systems perspective, younger women are considered dangerous because they are unconditioned. Divergent much?

They haven’t yet learned to override discomfort.
They haven’t yet traded safety for belonging.
They haven’t yet normalized harm as “just how things are.”

Family systems theory shows that individuals who disrupt homeostasis even by naming truth are often targeted more harshly than those causing harm. This is something even I have experienced first hand being online. And guess what, it’s the women who are the most aggressive in the DM’s.

Now, In these dynamics, the man is predictable. The younger woman is destabilizing to the predictable system. So the system responds by silencing her, not stopping him. Raise your hand if you have been silenced in the workplace? Shit, over 10 years ago, I had a whole orthodontist demand I take my review down, tried to bride me with services to do it. This shows up everywhere

Now I want you to reflect briefly for a moment. Any of this sound familiar for you?

Attachment, Power, and Identification With the Aggressor

Clinical psychology adds another layer.

Anna Freud described identification with the aggressor as a defense mechanism where individuals align with power to reduce their own vulnerability to what is threat to their safety. Elder women who endured sexism, harassment, or exploitation without protection often unconsciously identify with male authority rather than with younger women whose pain reactivates unresolved grief, rage, or helplessness. Protecting the man protects the psyche from confronting what was never protected in themselves.

Grief…

Why “Handling It Quietly” Feels Safer Than Accountability

Organizational psychology research on institutional betrayal shows that systems often prioritize reputation management over individual safety. Elder women placed in supervisory or gatekeeping roles are frequently tasked explicitly or implicitly with containment rather than justice.

This creates a role conflict:

• Confronting the man risks destabilizing the institution.

• Supporting the younger woman risks exposing systemic failure.

• Silencing preserves order.

Order becomes confused with ethics.

Cultural Context Intensifies the Pattern

In collectivist or reputation-based cultures including many medical, religious, academic, and tight-knit ethnic communities, hierarchy is protected at all costs. I have seen this in therapy sessions and in clinical behavioral health capacities, especially with children and the loyalty binds to the parent, even if that parent is harmful. Research on honor-based systems shows that whistleblowers are often treated as traitors, regardless of what the truth is. Elder women, having survived within these norms, may view silence not as a form of harm, but as responsibility.

Also, zoom out a bit.

This is what helps us lead with curiosity instead of blame, because those of us that are accustom to living in chaos waves, the moment we reach the calm waters of the lake, we begin to feel unsafe. Why? Because the waves are familiar and we built skills adaptations to survive those waves. This is the same concept of the generations before us that do not know how to adapt to a world with "boundaries" and "safe spaces." Often, especially here in this city, I will see the older generations of women weaponize those very terms to get back the control that worked for them, but disconnecting their family from themselves in order to manage the women's emotions. This is what outsourcing is. In cultures where we scapegoat "The Culture" to justify harm, this is why you see it in the workplace; it spreads there.

The younger woman is framed as reckless.
The elder woman is framed as realistic.
The man remains untouched.

Sort of the same dynamic when they were kids right? (now, pause. We know if we are exercising our dendrites for nuance this is not the case for all correct?)

Just checking…

Think about it. Many times when I work with clients who have been cheated on, the woman turns on the "other woman" instead of turning on the man who was unfaithful. This in itself represents the very pattern these young women, as kids, watched their mothers do. They would hold the daughter accountable while bypassing what the son does. I saw this within my own family dynamics growing up, but also my husband’s family. I married into a Punjabi family; the hardest part about being in cultures that use religion and "this is how we are" is how often I watch little girls get bypassed. Little girls get slapped, or even their lip gets busted, because their little brother was never taught respect, boundaries, and the word "no." Many times in families that do not have the skills on how to navigate these complexities, they laugh when incidents happen. Many mothers also feel unsupported when faced with challenging boys with bad behavior and aggression. So how do they even get support? Especially if the elders are telling them how to parent.

This Is How Patriarchy Replicates Itself Without Men Having to Enforce It

How do you think patriarchal systems survive? Truly? It didn’t survive because men are powerful. They survive because women are trained to manage harm quietly, absorb discomfort, and redirect accountability downward. This does not make elder women villains, but for many who have not exercised the cognitive muscle of discernment, they will see this as blaming women. That is quite the contrary to my work. I speak about these patterns because someone has to.

For many who grow up in abusive environments with a mother or father who would allow the brother to get away with being physically harmful to the daughter,and only intervene with the son screamed for mom. If mothers and son cultures are being scrutinized for the way in which they are parenting, especially their boys. They are going to do what they need to do in order to survive that dynamic. Not understanding the unconscious dynamic they're creating within their children.

Field Note: The Metabolism of Harm and the Body Tax

This conversation is not about bashing men, and it is definitely not about bashing women. I want to go on a brief tangent real quickly about this because it is probably one of the aches I have experienced the most being online publicly. The amount of people who discharge their own unhealed wounds onto you, simply because they never learned how to metabolize them, is the same ache that shows up in the workplace. I myself have experienced workplace dynamics: being ambushed, having women threaten my license—all of it. Working in a school setting in this city really opened my eyes to selective avoidance: how we bypass harm depending on who did it, yet hold others accountable simply because we don’t like them, or because they said something we misperceived, or better yet, hating you because of how much others love you.

It’s easier to frame discussions that are difficult by externalizing blame, yelling “victim blamer.” But the one thing I have learned about those who scream that? They often suppress, hide, and cover up harm. This suppression isn’t just a social habit; it’s a physiological burden. As Slepian and Moulton-Tetlock (2019) noted, the “cognitive load” of keeping secrets or hiding harm drains our mental resources and keeps the nervous system in a state of constant, low-level threat.

How are families supposed to heal if the older generations shut you down from talking? Meanwhile, they still expect you to honor what they need you to honor for them because it regulates them. But have we ever asked what makes our parents and the generations before us so activated to begin with? Avoidance and suppression do so much to the body. Chronic regret and unresolved trauma act like a “glitching program” in our biology, spiking cortisol and causing systemic inflammation (Roese & Vohs, 2012).

Substance use gets manifested as a coping means because to live with harm, an ache, or a breach of safety—without being protected by your own parents—feels like a level of abandonment. It leaves you feeling safer to just mimic the same adaptations they keep trying to instill within you. This is the core of the "mind-body" trap: when we are forced out of our Window of Tolerance (Siegel, 2012) by a lack of protection, our bodies begin to "keep the score," manifesting that emotional abandonment as physical pain, fatigue, or addiction. It is about understanding how certain people repeatedly get away with harm inside cultures and systems built on avoidance and why that pattern persists across generations.

Because when harm is never named, it doesn’t disappear.
It mutates and spreads.

This Happens to Men Too and Often by Other Men

Men are also harmed in these systems. In workplaces, institutions, teams, fraternities, religious settings, and medical hierarchies, younger or lower-status men are often subjected to boundary violations, humiliation, coercion, hazing, or sexualized misconduct by more powerful men.

And the response is often the same:

• minimize

• normalize

• joke

• redirect

• silence

“Don’t be dramatic.”
“That’s just how he is.”
“You’ll get over it.”

The system protects the offender because he holds power and the culture has learned to orbit around it. The same way it learned to orbit around the woman in the other example.

Avoidance Is the Root, Not Gender

Cultures that are organized around avoidance prioritize:

• harmony over truth

• reputation over repair

• stability over safety

• containment over accountability

In these systems, naming harm is more threatening than the harm itself.

In these systems, naming harm is more threatening than the harm itself. So the response becomes managerial in nature. This is how people “get away with things”—not through conspiracy, but through collective discomfort with confrontation. If I had to point the finger at the culprit of what I see in the community I serve in El Paso, this is the pesky culprit: Fear of confrontation.

It Starts in Childhood and It’s Not Subtle

What I have seen in my clinical practice, especially at the time when I was working with children... Unfortunately, due to the amount of subpoenas you get when working with kids, it just became so problematic for my other clients to work with kids because now we pull systems in. But what happens if the system the child’s family is in is also the same system that the city operates in? Now you have school staff, judges, therapists, and doctors that condition the same avoidance. It’s probably why me working here ruffles feathers, because I have no issue with confrontation, because I don’t see it as confrontation; I see it as communicating.

In many families, little boys are allowed to:

• hit

• bite

• spit

• rage

• break boundaries

Behaviors that would be swiftly corrected in daughters are reframed as:
“He’s just energetic.”
“He doesn’t know better.”
“Boys will be boys.”

Meanwhile, daughters are taught early to:

• self-regulate

• anticipate others

• manage emotions

• be agreeable

• take responsibility

This is not because parents don’t love their sons; it is because many mothers do not feel safe enforcing consequences on boys the way they do with girls. Why is that, I wonder? Who is watching? 👀

That discomfort matters, but so does the need for inquiry.

The Invisible Tron Highways (A.K.A: undercurrents of energy)

When Avoidance Meets Puberty, the Body Carries the Cost

When behavior is never named, limited, or metabolized, it doesn’t resolve, it discharges. This discharge becomes the invisible Tron highways of undercurrents the eyes can’t see but the body can feel. When that incongruences is named gaslighting starts. We see this at the macro all the time, we DARVO: Deny, Attack, Reverse, Victim, Offender.

Unaddressed aggression, entitlement, shame, and confusion often convert into:

• hypersexuality

• compulsive sexual behavior

• substance use

• emotional numbing

• risk-seeking

This is what happens when we regulate the wrong way because no one taught us the healthy way. Avoidance doesn’t create peace it creates pressure. What happens to people under pressure with no release valve?

They implode on themselves. If you are in the cross fire that means you too.

Why Elder Women Protect Men Later in Life

When sons grow into men without ever encountering meaningful relational limits, the system adjusts around them rather than asking them to adjust or at least learn to adapt.

Elder women often step in as buffers:

• smoothing conflicts

• explaining behavior

• discouraging complaints

• reframing harm

Psychodynamically, this is linked to identification with the aggressor, a defense described by Anna Freud, where aligning with power reduces one’s own vulnerability. Protecting him feels safer than confronting the system that failed to protect anyone. Have a son and your mom will start interfering with your parenting because her old operating system can’t understand the new age princinspae of accountability. Also, please note. there are many mothers who step into the identification role with their own daughters. This could be due to wanting access to grandkids, or fear of losing the relationship. We also want to consider the intrinsic motivation behind those fears and attachment regardless if valid. Validity is not the point here. Inquiry is. The goal is to understand the why behind the behavior within ourselves. So if you are playing the role as the mother of the daughter who you fear will cut you off, take the grand kids, etc. That message is for you. Reflect, How did my daughter learn this. Not from the lens of blame. From the lens of investigator of patterns.

Now, Circling Back:

We have to circle back to where this begins: the family system. When silence shows up as a means of safety, it creates a devastating bind. Imagine a little girl coming forward to her mother, letting her know, “Hey, your boyfriend touched me,” or “So-and-so did XYZ.” If that mother has unhealed attachment dynamics, if she hasn’t learned how to advocate or voice her truth—she is paralyzed. She may be too afraid of rocking the boat with the family member whose son did it, or she’s terrified of the fallout within the family structure or her own partnership. The reasons don’t matter when we look at the impact long term. In that moment, that mother may unconsciously silence a real, visceral trauma in her daughter. The harm gets minimized because of the mother’s fear of facing a discomforting conversation.

This is exactly why, when I train my clients through effective communication protocols, I tell them: It is not about doing it perfectly. It’s about getting it out. That is the real work just getting it said. Because if you don’t do it now, the world will eventually put you back into that exact same position. You’re going to have to do it at work for yourself, or you’re going to have to do it somewhere else to advocate for your own child. The “Body Tax” and the systemic pressure will keep rising until the silence is broken.

The Conversation That Needs to Happen

The real question is not "Who is the villain?" It is:

• Why does confrontation feel more dangerous than harm? Especially a harm that many of us are already silently suffering in?

• Why are daughters expected to tolerate limits sons are not given?

• Why does silence feel like safety? Who taught us it? Where do you think they learned it from?

• What would accountability look like if it wasn’t confused with punishment?

This is not a gender war (despite the algorithms plot to turn the genders against each other. ) This is a systems inquiry, and systems only change when what was once unspeakable becomes discussable. All my work asks is…. Let’s put it on the table.

Like kinetic sand that we dig our hands in— Feel and explore.

Reflection for the Reader

1. Where have you seen harm redirected instead of addressed?

2. When has “keeping the peace” required someone else to carry the cost?

3. Whose safety was ultimately protected?

What came up for you with this?

Our corner of readers is growing and this is so so exciting for our corner of the internet! 🥰

As always Safari members.

Come as you are. Where you are. 🫶🏽

📣Don’t Forget: Advice Column is available.
For questions, patterns, or situations you’re carrying write in.

Link here.

References

Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with Patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290.

Roese, N. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). The Visualization of Regret: A Functional View. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 172-177.

Siegel, D. J. (2012). The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. Guilford Press.

Slepian, M. L., & Moulton-Tetlock, E. (2019). The Cognitive Load of Secrecy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(2), 217-232.

Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Viking.

Data Collectors…

Happy Monday!

Let’s talk Activated Survival Self (ASS)

There’s something I heard once that stuck with me:

This is not about good or bad, right or wrong. It’s about what’s sustainable for you. Understand in this context ass is the part of ourselves we hide. These parts come out when we are moody, tired, upset, or angry. They show up when we are suppressing our truth or when our boundaries are being stretched past our own window of tolerance. It’s the part of us that activates when we feel judged, exposed, threatened, or at risk of losing control. It’s what Jung would call the shadow self— the disowned parts of us that surface under pressure. In here, I call it the Activated Survival Self, and if I’m honest, this isn’t about spotting the ass in other people. It’s about noticing it with ourselves.

The Activated Survival Self shows up when we’re trying to protect ourselves, but most of the time, we’re not protecting ourselves from other people. We’re protecting ourselves from… ourselves.

From shame.

From inadequacy.

From the fear of being replaceable, unworthy, too much, not enough.

That’s when we avoid. That’s when we react. That’s when we triangulate instead of communicate. That’s when we blame tone instead of facing the message. That’s when we say, “Not everyone can leave,” “Not everyone has access,” “Slavery! What about that, huh?!” anytime we are faced with our own agency, instead of asking ourselves why we’re tolerating what we say is intolerable. We jump to the extremes, and those are often data.

Realizing how I am showing up in my marriage pressured, revolving in the old script and the metacognition training is showing me how my nervous system wants to blame my husband. This is what many women fall into. Doesn’t help that all we see is women scapegoat men for what they refuse to face.

Ego noise.

All the tension, pressure cooker energy. That wasn’t about my husband. That was about the version of me that had quietly outsourced parts of myself and called it “doable.” “Okay… not an issue.” The part of myself that autopilots right back into the old version of myself that over-accommodates for someone else’s comfort. When we love our partners we must be careful not to love at the cost to ourself. That love can easily become resentment. My husband and I have faced our fair share of seasonal challenges. Each time evolving us into a level of awareness that brings me back to looking at myself.

Subscribe now

I want to start this series because well… my ass shows too. And lately it’s been peeking it’s little self out and causing me to self-sabotage, over-function, do too much. You know the drill. I noticed earlier this month when I published 9 pieces of work in 2 weeks. I needed to. Slow. Down.

That was a sign.

A sign that showed me I was in the ASS default mode network, looping and looping, and an interruption was needed fast.

This series isn’t about shaming the ass. It’s about naming it. Because once you can name your Activated Survival Self, you stop confusing it with your identity or other peoples assumed intentions. You will start noticing it as a sign that something is out of alignment with you and your inner self. Exploring what brings you back into alignment balanced and not feeling so disoriented all the time. Doing this content work only puts all my millions of ideas in a place where object permanence lives heavy. Working from home, does not help the discipline either. But it does in fact provide opportunities to build it.

The Activated Survival Self does not listen. Nope… it does not regulate. It does not self-reflect. It denies, deflects, and tone-polices.

What I am see now with people’s ASS is, It will quote therapy language, repeat buzzwords, and perform insight, but it won’t embody any of it. The ASS protects ego stability at all costs. The trap is trying to win over the ASS that is within yourself by succumbing to it, or in others by reacting to it.

Trying to explain yourself better.

Trying to perfect your tone or adjust it.

Trying to prove you’re loving enough, calm enough, patient enough to deserve being heard. All that does is condition the world that you will shrink for them… At the expense of yourself. Relationships, Marriages, Workplace dynamics all challenge us with this.

Understand, the Activated Survival Self is not relational; it’s protective. We can’t reason with someone’s defense system when their identity feels threatened nor can others reason with us. The only move is refusal. Refusal to engage the defensive behavior. Refusal to argue with distortions from other people (which much of what people say is a distortion). Refusal to shrink yourself to make someone else more comfortable in their avoidance.

You wait for the self to return. If it returns.

Now What triggers the ASS to show up?

Well that depends on you, your triggers, and your nervous system baseline. In future writings and podcast episodes we can unpacks this further. Part of my ASS is trying to Costco style everything to the point of burn out for me. 🤭

Here are some examples to see where we have fallen into ASSery

1. “Not Everyone Can Leave” as Identity Armor

You see an educational post about boundaries or leaving toxic environments. Your chest tightens. Instead of asking yourself why you’re still staying, you post:

“Not everyone has that option.”
“It’s not that simple.”
“This is privileged advice.”

Are structural barriers real? Yes.
But sometimes that statement becomes an emotional shield and a way to normalize endurance instead of confronting fear.

Bypass move: Reflection
Is my comment about systemic reality… or is it regulating my attachment to suffering?

2. Triangulating Instead of Communicating

Your ASS avoids direct discomfort. Instead of asking the person directly, you tell three other people how upset you are. You gather allies. You rehearse the injustice.

You say:

“I just need to vent.”
“I don’t want drama.”
“I don’t even care that much.”

But you do care about that really. You’re just scared of confrontation and found a way to co-regulate at the expense to never facing the issue.

Bypass move:
I’m talking about them instead of to them because I’m afraid of rejection.

3. Over-Functioning to Prevent Abandonment

   You anticipate needs. You smooth everything over. You manage emotions for two. Your ASS believes if you stay useful, you’ll stay safe.

Bypass logic: I’m just supportive.
Truth: You’re afraid to stop and see what happens if you don’t perform.

4. Losing Self and Calling It Devotion
   You stop asking what you want. You stop checking your own signals. You become reactive instead of reflective. Your ASS has fused with the relationship.

Bypass logic: “This is what commitment looks like.”
Truth: Commitment without selfhood breeds resentment.

As I explore my own ASS and how it shows up under environmental pressure or perceived pressure due to old scripts trying to come back online. I challenge you all to do the same. Women, for many of us, that script goes online when we are in relationships. Understand that much of the information out there is designed for the ASS to come out. Many people have their ASS permanently stuck as their baseline for functioning and have no idea why.

What I mean by this is: if you are always at an 8+ on the nervous system activation scale and 10 is the highest (meaning explosive, reactive behavior), while 3 or below is rest-and-digest, the goal state do you know what you need to get there?

Have you ever even been there?

If you have never been under a 3 on the nervous system scale, how will you know that you arrived there? What will you notice? What will you see? What will it feel like? This is training. Because if you can’t even notice your own rate fluctuating—and what environmental or internal factors influence it—how do you expect your partner to?

Your children to?

People in your life to?

That’s the ASS right there, creating an unconscious contract for others. Outsourcing the internal work.

Everyone’s ass shows up eventually.

Mine.
Yours.
Your partner’s.
Your boss’s.
Your favorite influencer’s.

The question isn’t whether it exists. The question is whether you can see it when it’s yours. If you can only identify the Activated Survival Self in other people, you’re still inside yours. This series isn’t about shaming it. We don’t do that shame business over here. The goal is to sit with it, look at it, feel it, but most importantly, name it.

If that feels uncomfortable, good. That means we’re close to something honest.

We’re not here to erase our shadow. We’re here to integrate it.

Till next time.

Come as you are, where you are 🫶🏽

INTRODUCTION

Tone policing …. Have you heard of It?

It’s rarely ever about tone.
It’s about discomfort, shame activation, and the collapse of someone’s nervous system into a story about what your tone means about them. What looks like “you’re being rude” often reveals, “Something in me got touched, and I’d rather correct you than face it.” This is not about invalidating the real impact tone can have, tone matters, yes. But the meaning we attach to tone is a psychological Rorschach test that exposes our conditioning, our trauma, and our developmental gaps. Clinical research on shame (Nathanson, Scheff) shows that when internal distress cannot be metabolized, it is externalized through correction, accusation, or moral framing. In trauma-exposed populations, tone becomes a proxy battlefield because it feels safer to regulate delivery than to confront content. What presents as “civility” is often an unconscious attempt to regain nervous system control. This pattern is not random; it reflects learned survival strategies shaped by culture, identity pressure, and relational power dynamics.

From a clinical perspective, these patterns are best understood through the interaction of identity pressure, shame conditioning, and nervous system adaptation, rather than through character or intent. Groups that have historically faced surveillance, marginalization, or moral scrutiny often develop heightened sensitivity to perceived threat, including threat embedded in language, tone, or confrontation. In such contexts, tone policing functions as a regulatory strategy, an attempt to restore internal safety by controlling external input. Across clinical populations with mood disorders or trauma-based personality structures, particularly those involving shame vulnerability or identity diffusion, direct naming can activate collapse, rage, or defensive moralization rather than reflection. The observed behaviors are therefore not random, nor are they uniformly distributed across populations; they reflect adaptive strategies shaped by developmental history, cultural conditioning, and chronic stress exposure. What appears socially as overreaction or control is often clinically legible as survival logic carried into environments where it no longer serves.

This article explores:

1. Why people fixate on tone

2. Why marginalized groups police one another

3. Shame → Deflection → Role Reversal (the UNO Reverse pattern)

4. How families groom us into tone reactivity

5. The micro–macro link between personal relationships and social behavior

6. Why discomfort exposure is essential for development

7. Research on perception, shame, interoception, and moral superiority

8. The sociological impact of 2020 on entitlement, vigilance, and mistrust

9. Why people interpret naming as shaming

10. How tone policing reinforces stagnation, personally and culturally

Clinical note:
Each of these dynamics reflects the interaction between nervous system regulation, shame processing, identity threat, and learned relational survival strategies. Rather than isolated social behaviors, they represent patterned responses shaped by developmental conditioning, family systems, cultural reinforcement, and trauma exposure. Taken together, they illustrate how avoidance of discomfort at the individual level scales into rigidity, control, and moralized reactivity at the collective level.

When Tone Policing Isn’t Really About Tone

Tone policing is a defensive maneuver—a neurological shortcut used when the nervous system doesn’t want to metabolize truth.

Polyvagal Theory (Porges)

When someone hears something that activates shame, the body often drops into:

• Dorsal collapse (“I’m being attacked”)

• Sympathetic fight/argue (“Fix your tone”)

• Fawn (“I’ll be good if you soften your delivery”)

The cognitive brain then scrambles to justify this reaction, often locating the “problem” externally.
Tone becomes the scapegoat.

Tone is the decoy.
Shame is the trigger.
Deflection is the strategy.

📓 (Field Notes)

From a neurobiological perspective, shame is one of the fastest emotions to collapse access to the prefrontal cortex. When shame is activated, the nervous system prioritizes threat reduction over meaning-making, which limits curiosity and increases reactivity. In this state, the brain seeks an externalizable cause to explain internal distress, because turning inward would require tolerance of vulnerability. Tone becomes an ideal target because it is subjective, socially reinforced, and morally defensible. Correcting tone allows the individual to regain a sense of control while avoiding engagement with the content that triggered shame. Clinically, this maneuver functions as a protective bypass—it preserves self-image and nervous system stability at the cost of relational truth and repair.

Over time, repeated reliance on this strategy reinforces avoidance pathways rather than integration, making discomfort feel increasingly dangerous and correction feel increasingly justified.

The Story We Tell Ourselves About Tone

Lisa Feldman Barrett’s theory of constructed emotion shows us that the brain fills in perceptual gaps with prediction.
So when someone says something direct, the listener’s brain asks:

• “Is this safe?”

• “What does this say about me?”

• “What old template does this resemble?”

Tone becomes the surface-level justification for deeper fear-based meaning-making.

People aren’t reacting to what was said, but what their body interpreted it to mean.

📓 (Field Notes)

According to predictive processing models, the brain does not passively receive information; it actively constructsexperience based on prior learning, emotional memory, and bodily sensation. Interoceptive signals, such as heart rate, gut tension, or muscle contraction, are interpreted by the brain before conscious language emerges. When these bodily cues resemble past threat states, the brain assigns meaning rapidly and defensively. In individuals with trauma histories or shame conditioning, directness is often pre-associated with criticism, rejection, or loss of attachment. As a result, the nervous system generates a narrative that feels factual but is actually inferential. Tone becomes the story the mind tells to make sense of a bodily alarm it does not yet know how to regulate.

Clinically, this explains why reassurance rarely resolves tone-based conflict. The issue is not misunderstanding; it is misattribution driven by somatic memory. Until the body learns that directness does not equal danger, tone will continue to be experienced as threat rather than information.

Family Conditioning: Where Tone Reactivity Begins

So many adults were raised by parents who said in their sweetest voice:

• “You can talk to me.”

But when you actually did, they:

• Dismissed

• Minimized

• Gaslit

• Accused

• Deflected shame

• Claimed someone “put you up to it”

This creates a vicious cycle:
Tone doesn’t feel like communication to them—it feels like danger.

This also trains people to weaponize tone against those who confront them because:

• “If I can make you wrong, I don’t have to feel what you just triggered in me.”

This is how entire families collapse into:

• Avoidance

• Delusion

• Chronic misattunement

• Fragile self-image

• Punishing the truth-teller

📓 (Field Notes)

From a developmental and family systems perspective, this pattern reflects attachment injury paired with emotional invalidation. When caregivers verbally invite honesty but behaviorally punish it, children experience a double bind: connection is promised, but truth threatens attachment. Over time, the nervous system learns that expression equals risk, and tone becomes fused with survival. In these environments, the child does not learn how to repair rupture; they learn how to avoid it. Direct communication becomes associated with shame, retaliation, or abandonment, while indirectness and emotional suppression are rewarded as safety. This conditions a hypervigilant relational stance in which confrontation is perceived not as information, but as threat.

Clinically, this is where tone sensitivity becomes intergenerational. Adults raised in such systems often react to present-day conversations through the lens of unresolved childhood dynamics. Weaponizing tone allows them to regain control and avoid the internal collapse that once followed speaking honestly. The truth-teller is punished not for being wrong, but for destabilizing the family’s emotional equilibrium.

The UNO Reverse Strategy (Role Reversal as Self-Protection)

This pattern appears everywhere in my Safari data:

Person A: Names a dynamic clearly.
Person B:

• Avoids shame

• Clings to pride

• Flips the narrative

• Portrays themselves as the harmed party

This creates a warped hierarchy where:
Accountability = Attack
Honesty = Abuse
Naming = Shaming

Person B now gets to maintain innocence, superiority, and emotional control without ever engaging in repair or growth.

This is common among:

• Men (especially Black men raised under respectability pressure)

• Individuals with fragile self-concepts

• People conditioned to equate discomfort with humiliation

It’s survival—not villainy.
But survival strategies cannot build intimacy or community.

📓 (Field Notes)

Clinically, this maneuver reflects a shame-avoidant defense organized around self-preservation rather than malice. When accountability threatens identity coherence, the psyche prioritizes stability by externalizing fault and internalizing victimhood. Role reversal allows the individual to remain emotionally intact without confronting dependency, vulnerability, or error. This strategy is reinforced in environments where dignity, respectability, or moral positioning are tied to survival. In such contexts, admitting harm can feel synonymous with annihilation. While adaptive in high-threat systems, this defense becomes relationally corrosive over time, blocking mutuality, accountability, and repair. What once ensured survival ultimately prevents connection.

2020’s Sociological Impact on Shame, Entitlement & Hypervigilance

The pandemic and social justice uprisings produced a generation that:

• Became chronically online

• Obsessed over moral purity

• Developed hypervigilant perception

• Adopted outrage as identity

• Learned to avoid discomfort via performance

• Mistook emotional intensity for clarity

This created what I call the Panic Child Culture—adults policing one another’s tone, language, and choices as a way to regulate their own internal chaos.

“Don’t shop at Target.”
“We hate Teslas now.”
“That word is problematic.”

These are not moral truths.
They are subjective survival codes and they are being enforced as universal laws and the default for everyone. Those pesky unconscious contracts. Sociologically, this is the same mechanism behind cult dynamics, purity culture, and rigid family systems.

📓 (Field Notes)

From a clinical and sociological lens, prolonged exposure to collective threat collapses tolerance for ambiguity and increases reliance on external regulation. During periods of uncertainty, individuals seek psychological safety through rules, certainty, and moral alignment. Online platforms amplify this response by rewarding vigilance, outrage, and performative correctness with belonging and validation. Hypervigilance narrows perception. Nuance is experienced as danger, disagreement as threat, and neutrality as betrayal. Emotional intensity becomes mistaken for insight because it feels stabilizing to the nervous system. Clinically, this mirrors family systems where emotional chaos is managed through rigid rules rather than emotional processing.

The Panic Child Culture is not evidence of moral evolution; it is evidence of widespread nervous system overwhelm. What looks like conviction is often dysregulation seeking structure. Without discomfort tolerance and internal regulation, communities default to control, surveillance, and tone enforcement as substitutes for safety.

Why Marginalized Groups Police Each Other

Ethnographic observation and sociological theory point to:

• Internalized oppression → Lateral aggression

• Identity fragility → Policing “the in-group”

• Collective trauma → Hypervigilance

• Moral performance → Social currency

Black people correct other Black people.
Queer communities police language.

Not all.
But enough to map the pattern.

📓 (Field Notes)

Clinically, lateral policing emerges when external threat cannot be safely confronted, forcing regulation inward rather than upward. In marginalized or historically surveilled groups, belonging becomes conditional, and deviation is experienced as danger to group survival. Correcting the in-group provides a sense of control, moral positioning, and temporary safety when systemic power feels inaccessible.

Identity fragility intensifies this dynamic. When identity itself carries unprocessed trauma, disagreement threatens not just beliefs but coherence of self. Moral performance then becomes a stabilizing behavior, rewarded with inclusion, protection, and status. Over time, emotional vigilance replaces relational trust, and correction replaces curiosity.

What appears as accountability is often a form of anxiety management and it is being disguised as ethics. The nervous system mistakes control for safety, and communities begin reenacting the very dynamics they were formed to resist.

The Link to Couples & Family Gridlock

If naming is interpreted as shaming, then:

• No repair can happen

• No developmental correction occurs

• No intimacy grows

• No honest conversation can survive

Tone sensitivity → Shame activation → Perception distortion → Emotional shutdown.

You can’t build a relationship with someone who experiences every boundary as an attack.

📓 (Field Notes)

From a couples and family systems perspective, repair requires the capacity to tolerate discomfort without collapsing into defensiveness. When shame is easily activated, the nervous system prioritizes self-protection over connection, making mutual influence impossible. Boundaries are misread as rejection, and feedback is experienced as character assassination rather than information.

Over time, this creates relational gridlock. One partner learns to self-silence to preserve peace, while the other remains emotionally unchallenged and underdeveloped. Intimacy erodes not because of conflict, but because truth becomes unsafe. Clinically, this pattern mirrors early attachment environments where emotional expression threatened connection, and it reliably reproduces disconnection across generations.

Discomfort Exposure Is the Muscle We Need

Growth requires:

• Discomfort

• Shame tolerance

• Nervous system endurance

• Discernment

• Emotional agility

You can’t become who you are without feeling things you’ve spent years avoiding.

Tone policing destroys this process by redirecting the discomfort back onto the other person.

📓(Field Notes)

From a neurodevelopmental perspective, emotional growth occurs through graded exposure to distress within a tolerable window. Avoidance may reduce discomfort in the short term, but it prevents the nervous system from learning that intensity can be survived without collapse or retaliation. Shame tolerance, like any regulatory capacity, strengthens through experience, not protection.

Clinically, tone policing functions as a displacement maneuver. Rather than metabolizing internal activation, the individual externalizes it, interrupting learning and reinforcing fragility. Over time, this erodes discernment, as discomfort becomes synonymous with danger rather than data. Emotional agility cannot develop in environments where discomfort is consistently redirected or punished.

Tone AND Truth: The Nuance

Tone matters.
But tone is not all that matters.

Sometimes the presence of tone tells us:

• “A boundary is being hit”

• “A truth is landing”

• “A cycle is repeating”

• “Someone finally found their voice”

Instead of asking:
“Why is there a tone?”
People ask:
“How dare you have one?”

That is the sickness.

📓 (Field Notes)

From a clinical standpoint, mature communication requires the ability to differentiate affect from intent. Tone carries information about nervous system activation, but it does not inherently invalidate content. When systems focus exclusively on tone, they often do so to avoid engaging with meaning, responsibility, or change.

In regulated relationships, tone is interpreted as data, not disqualification. It signals pressure points, unresolved patterns, or moments of differentiation. Pathologizing tone suppresses voice, reinforces power imbalances, and privileges comfort over truth. Clinically, this dynamic preserves dysfunction by silencing the very signals needed for repair.

The ability to hear truth with tone is not a threat to safety. It is a marker of psychological maturity.

Conclusion

Tone policing is not a communication issue. It is a regulation issue.

Across families, relationships, and cultures, tone becomes the battleground when shame is intolerable, truth feels destabilizing, and nervous systems lack the capacity to stay present with discomfort. What is framed as civility or safety is often an avoidance strategy that protects fragility at the expense of growth. So ask yourselves can you afford that? When tone is used to disqualify truth, development comes to a halt. These patterns do not emerge in isolation. They are shaped by early family conditioning, reinforced by identity pressure, amplified by digital culture, and normalized by systems that reward performance over processing. Survival strategies that once protected individuals and communities from harm are now being misapplied in contexts that require discernment, differentiation, and accountability.

Leading with curiosity is critical, because narcissism is not always the Voldemort-style villain we imagine. Often, it is a frightened, panicked child who was abandoned emotionally, left without the skills to ask for help, and forced to adapt in order to receive care or survive at all. That adaptation may later cause harm, but it did not begin as cruelty. It began as protection.

Curiosity does not excuse harm. It allows us to interrupt the loop.

Growth requires the willingness to feel what we have been taught to avoid, to hear truth without collapsing into shame, and to remain in relationship without outsourcing discomfort onto others. When tone is met with discernment instead of defensiveness, and truth is met with regulation instead of control, intimacy becomes possible again.

The work ahead is not to eliminate tone, but to build the nervous system capacity to hear it.

That is how individuals mature.
That is how families repair.
That is how cultures evolve.

Extended Reading & Clinical Foundations

Nervous System Regulation & Trauma

• Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation.

• van der Kolk, B. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score.

• Maté, G. (2022). The Myth of Normal: Trauma, Illness, and Healing in a Toxic Culture.

• Ogden, P., Minton, K., & Pain, C. (2006). Trauma and the Body: A Sensorimotor Approach to Psychotherapy.

Shame, Defensiveness & Moral Emotion

• Nathanson, D. L. (1992). Shame and Pride: Affect, Sex, and the Birth of the Self.

• Scheff, T. J. (1967). Toward a Sociological Theory of Shame.

• Brown, B. (2012). Daring Greatly (for cultural shame literacy, not diagnostic framing).

• Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and Guilt.

Constructed Emotion, Perception & Meaning-Making

• Barrett, L. F. (2017). How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain.

• Siegel, D. J. (2012). The Developing Mind.

• Friston, K. (2010). The Free-Energy Principle: A Unified Brain Theory? (advanced reading on predictive processing).

Family Systems, Attachment & Differentiation

• Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice.

• Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and Family Therapy.

• Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for Identifying Disorganized Attachment.

• Siegel, D. J., & Hartzell, M. (2003). Parenting from the Inside Out.

Personality Structure, Narcissism & Defensive Adaptation

• Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism.

• Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self.

• Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love.

• Ronningstam, E. (2011). Narcissistic Personality Disorder: A Clinical Perspective.

Social Identity, Power & Moral Policing

• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.

• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish.

• Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind.

• Bandura, A. (1999). Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities.

Emotional Labor, Culture & Performance

• Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart.

• Illouz, E. (2007). Consuming the Romantic Utopia.

• Lasch, C. (1979). The Culture of Narcissism.

• Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming Conversation.

Collective Trauma, Moral Panic & Social Contagion

• Durkheim, E. (1897). Suicide (foundational for collective emotional regulation).

• Girard, R. (1986). The Scapegoat.

• Moscovici, S. (1985). The Age of the Crowd.

• Sunstein, C. R. (2019). How Change Happens.

Clinical Adjacent / Integrative Perspectives

• Wiest, B. The Mountain Is You (popular synthesis of emotional avoidance).

• Tolle, E. The Power of Now (non-clinical but relevant to reactivity awareness).

• Perry, B. D. What Happened to You? (developmental trauma lens).

Before I begin, there are reflection questions at the end of this essay :)

I recently rewatched the 1996 movie The Mirror Has Two Faces, and what struck me besides the nostalgia (which is why I love to watch old movies- ) was discomfort. The film felt less like a romantic comedy and more like a quiet warning that somehow slipped past us. It asked a question we no longer seem interested in asking: What happens when desire replaces devotion, and stimulation replaces intimacy? In today’s culture, love is often spoken about as a feeling, an aesthetic, or a performance. Sex, meanwhile, has been elevated as proof of connection. Fast, accessible, and detached from responsibility. The problem is not sex itself. The problem is what we’ve asked sex to stand in for.

From a clinical perspective, this confusion is not accidental. Attachment research has long shown that humans are wired for bonding through attunement, not novelty alone (Bowlby, 1988; Ainsworth, 1979). Yet modern dating culture prioritizes chemistry, immediacy, and desirability, signals of arousal—over the slower signals of safety, curiosity, and trust. That Dopamine high many chase in the early stages of falling for someone gets mistaken for intimacy. While a. spark gets mistaken for a bond. I watch this play out in my clinical practice with clients as well as my peers.

Neuroscience helps explain why this illusion is so convincing. Novel sexual encounters reliably activate dopamine pathways associated with reward and anticipation, but dopamine is not the bonding chemical—oxytocin is. Oxytocin is released through consistency, emotional safety, eye contact, mutual regulation, and time (Carter, 1998). When sex happens without relational containment, the nervous system may be stimulated, but it is not necessarily soothed or secured. This is why people can feel exhilarated and empty at the same time. A pattern I see often with many clients. Especially those where love was not something observed.

Sociologically, we are living in what Zygmunt Bauman called liquid love—relationships designed to remain flexible, non-binding, and disposable. Commitment is framed as a threat to freedom, while detachment is framed as empowerment. Needing depth is quietly recoded as insecurity. Wanting emotional continuity is labeled “too much.” What often goes unnamed is that this ethos mirrors avoidant attachment at scale a cultural norm that rewards emotional distance while punishing dependency, even though dependency is biologically normative.

Women’s bodies become central casualties in this system. When desirability is treated as social currency, bodies are no longer homes—they are products. Zoom out, in todays society more so, alteration is encouraged. Optimization of self is rewarded, and aging? Well aging has become pathologized. Being wanted becomes conflated with being valued. This is something I see in youth especially these days where “getting a man” is what many high school girls are looking for even if that “man” is unhealthy. So, the question subtly shifts from “Am I known?” to “Am I consumable?”

One of the most radical ideas in The Mirror Has Two Faces and one of the most endangered today is the notion that conversation itself can be erotic. Not performative banter, but a sort of sustained curiosity. The kind that requires listening, tolerating difference, and staying present when fantasy collapses. Can any of you reading remember a time where you experienced a level of conversation like that?

Today though, what I see with peers, friends, family, and the people I work with is that people often know each other’s bodies before they know each other’s inner worlds. I joke that we let our freak flags fly, exchanging bodily fluids but can’t exchange vulnerability. We touch before we talk, then wonder why we feel unseen. The downstream consequences are visible everywhere. Despite unprecedented access to sex, dating apps, and erotic imagery, loneliness rates continue to climb. In 2023, U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy released an advisory declaring that loneliness and social isolation in the United States had reached epidemic levels and represent a significant public health concern with about half of American adults reporting measurable loneliness and associated health risks comparable to smoking or obesity. Clinically, I see people who are sexually experienced but emotionally underdeveloped. Adept at performance, unfamiliar with the art of repair. They confuse independence with isolation and autonomy with disconnection.

Then there is the collective denial around consequence. We speak of sex as casual, but biology has never agreed to that contract. Children are not accidents of recklessness; they are reminders that sex has always been a creative force, whether we respect it or not. The shock is not that pregnancy happens it’s that we’ve culturally dissociated sex from meaning so thoroughly that we act surprised when life emerges from it. Now, breathe…This is not a moral argument. It is a nervous system one. When intimacy is rushed and attachment is avoided, people remain chronically dysregulated. They chase stimulation to soothe what only safety can heal. Over time, desire burns hot and fast, while love—slow, requiring patience and accountability which feels unfamiliar and even threatening.

The “Always the Bridesmaid” Belief and the Sexual Shortcut

Now, one thing that really stood out for me with this movie that I see in my clinicial practice. One of the quieter but most revealing threads in The Mirror Has Two Faces lives inside Barbra Streisand’s character in her assumptions. Before anything is confirmed, she already believes she will not be chosen. When Jeff Bridges’ character shows interest, her mind reflexively fills in the gap: He must want my sister. He must already have slept with her. No one wants me without an ulterior motive.

This is not vanity or insecurity in the shallow sense. Clinically, this is a core limiting belief a schema organized around undesirability. She even names it publicly in her classroom: “Always a bridesmaid, never a bride.” When beliefs like this calcify, they don’t just shape self-esteem; they shape behavior, expectation, and attachment strategy. From an attachment lens, this belief creates a relational paradox. If you expect not to be chosen, emotional intimacy becomes dangerous because it invites confirmation of the wound. Sex, however, offers a shortcut. It provides immediate evidence of desirability without requiring sustained emotional exposure. In that sense, sex becomes safer than love. Neurobiologically, this makes sense even if it doesn’t heal. Sexual engagement reliably increases dopamine, which temporarily improves mood, confidence, and felt worth. In a society organized around feeling better now, this relief is seductive. The problem, as we already noted, is that dopamine does not bond it motivates. Bonding requires oxytocin, which emerges through safety, predictability, and emotional presence over time. But time is exactly what a person with a “not chosen” belief struggles to tolerate.

Share

For some women, this creates a painful loop:
If I am not inherently desirable, then I must compensate. Sex becomes proof of value. Performance becomes a form of protection. While being wanted in the moment substitutes for being chosen over time. Clinically, this is where reenactment shows up. After sex, when dopamine drops and oxytocin was never fully established, the nervous system can spiral: rumination, shame, abandonment fear, self-blame. The original belief (“I’m not enough”) feels reinforced rather than challenged. The body got relief, but the attachment wound stayed intact. What makes this especially heartbreaking is that it’s not driven by excess desire it’s driven by self-erasure. The belief is not “I want sex,” but “I need to be good enough to be kept.” In a culture that markets sex as empowerment without addressing attachment wounds, this distinction is rarely named. The film quietly exposes this truth: when someone does not believe they are choosable, they will reach for whatever offers temporary evidence of worth. Sex sells not because people are shallow, but because many are unconsciously trying to disprove a story that has lived in their nervous system for years. And no amount of being wanted in the moment can heal a belief formed in the absence of being chosen.

Protective Realism, Schema Activation, and the Loneliness of Being “Fine”

Midway through the film, something subtle but clinically rich begins to surface. This is no longer about whether sex matters—it’s about what happens when both people suppress desire in the name of safety. Barbra Streisand’s character has swung the pendulum hard in the opposite direction of objectification. Her teaching reframes love as intellectual partnership, minimizing physical desire not because sex is bad, but because sex has historically cost her something. This is what I would call protective realism a belief system that masquerades as maturity, but is actually a trauma-informed adaptation: If I don’t want it, it can’t hurt me.

This is common today. People present as detached, “cool,” sexually casual, emotionally unbothered, while quietly bypassing the energetic and neurobiological exchange that comes with sexual contact. The body, however, doesn’t participate in the bypass. Oxytocin still releases. Attachment systems still activate. For many, sex without connection doesn’t feel liberating it can actually feel lonely, because bonding chemistry was initiated without relational containment. The film captures this realization. At the park, she watches couples touching, laughing, existing in easy affection. She notices a former student who has become engaged—there is no hatred, no contempt, only recognition. That is something I want. The grief is quiet. The question still remains unspoken.

So why doesn’t she say anything?

This is where schema activation explains the freeze. Her longstanding belief I am not chosen, I am tolerated makes need expression feel dangerous. Asking risks confirmation of the wound. Silence feels safer than rejection. Suppression becomes self-protection. Meanwhile, Jeff Bridges’ character is not “above” shallow dynamics he came from them. His turn away from sex appears less like transcendence and more like an overcorrection too. He is trying to be different, trying to honor what he believes she wants. In doing so, he suppresses his own desire. This is mutual masking.

There’s a critical scene in the restaurant that shows what attunement can look like. He tells the waiter she prefers her dressing on the side. She feels seen. Her body softens. That is attunement—accurate perception paired with responsive action. But moments later, when he asks her what she wants or needs from him, she says nothing. The opportunity closes. Attunement is not mind-reading. It requires expression + response. Without both, connection stalls. He notices her rituals the careful construction of the “perfect bite,” the sensory precision. He sees her. She sees him holding himself together, clearly struggling with restraint. The sexual tension is palpable, embodied, mutual and still unspoken. Desire is present. Safety is present. Voice is absent. Where does this ring true for you in your life?

Clinically, this is the cost of unresolved attachment schemas:

• She doesn’t ask because she learned that wanting disqualifies her.

• He doesn’t initiate because he learned that desire harms or overwhelms.

Both are attempting to protect the relationship. Both are slowly starving inside it.

Her hidden eating treats stashed away, pleasure taken privately is not incidental. It’s displacement. When desire cannot be expressed relationally, it seeks safer, solitary outlets. This mirrors what many people do today: consume pleasure quietly while denying the deeper hunger underneath.

From a neurobiological standpoint, this makes sense. Humans seek regulation. If relational oxytocin feels risky, the nervous system reaches for substitutes dopamine hits, sugar, sex without attachment, distraction. These soothe briefly but do not satisfy. Over time, the result is a particular kind of loneliness: being with someone while feeling unseen.

This is why attunement not sex alone is the antidote. Attunement means:

• noticing internal states,

• expressing needs without collapse,

• responding with presence,

• and marking your partner as chosen privately and publicly.

Without it, even well-intentioned relationships can feel hollow. With it, desire doesn’t threaten safety it deepens it. What this film quietly exposes and what I see daily in clinical work is that many people are not avoiding sex because they don’t want it. They are avoiding it because they are afraid to ask, afraid to need, afraid to discover whether they are actually chosen. Meanwhile those who chase sex avoid the vulnerability needed to bridge the gap in communication.

Perhaps the film’s quiet grief was this: that love without objectification requires courage, and courage is harder to sell than fantasy. But fantasy, no matter how polished, cannot regulate a nervous system or anchor a life. The question worth asking now is not whether we are sexually free, but whether we are emotionally available. Whether we are known. Whether we are building bonds that can hold time, conflict, and consequence.

Because when love becomes an illusion and sex becomes the substitute, people don’t become liberated. They become alone — together, but unattached.

Final Reflection

Attunement Is the Antidote (Not Sex, Not Distance)

What finally breaks the illusion in The Mirror Has Two Faces is not sex itself it’s truth being spoken. When she reappears blonde, fitted black dress, visibly embodied the shift is not cosmetic. It’s somatic. She is no longer shrinking. She is no longer hiding. She is no longer asking permission to exist. The confidence she radiates does not come from weight loss or makeup. It comes from a reorganization of belief: I was always pretty. I was always worthy of desire. I just didn’t live inside my body before.

And this is why his reaction matters. He becomes unsettled not because she looks “too sexy,” but because the relational power dynamic has changed. He says, “I’ll just have to get used to this,” as if her embodiment is something to tolerate rather than respond to. She immediately corrects the frame: No—we don’t have to continue this.

That moment is not rejection. It is differentiation.

She finally names what was buried under years of protective realism:

• She wants sex.

• She wants passion.

• She wants mess and chaos.

• She wants aliveness.

Not because she is insecure but because she is integrated. Which is why it was so beautiful to watch her develop as a character. This is the turning point the culture often misses. Wanting passion is not immaturity. Wanting sex is not shallow. Wanting intensity does not negate safety. What makes relationships lonely isn’t the need for desire its desire without attunement or attunement without embodiment.

Attunement is the antidote because it holds all of it:

• Desire without objectification

• Safety without suppression

• Passion without disappearance

Attunement means noticing, responding, choosing—out loud. It is the difference between “I see you” and “I will adjust myself to you.” It requires voice. It requires risk. It requires the courage to say, This is what I want, even when the answer might disrupt the bond.

She finally does that. And when she says, “You forced me to look at things I was too lazy or too scared to look at,” she is not blaming him, she is claiming herself. The illusion collapses here: love without embodiment is hollow, and sex without attunement is lonely. The answer was never one or the other.

The answer was integration of both…

Attachment Archetypes at Play

This film works because neither character is “the problem.” They are mirror wounds learning regulation in opposite directions.

Her Archetype: The Quietly Wounded Integrator

• Core schema: I am not chosen.

• Origin: maternal projection, sibling comparison, cultural prioritization of “sexiness.”

• Adaptation: intellectualization, suppression of desire, self-containment.

• Strength: emotional regulation, coherence, capacity for truth without collapse.

• Growth edge: expressing needs before certainty of being chosen.

She was never loudly insecure. She was conditioned, and once the belief loosens, confidence emerges naturally—without aggression, without contempt, without revenge.

His Archetype: The Avoidant Romantic Intellectual

• Core fear: If sex enters, connection will be lost.

• Origin: prior relationships where desire eclipsed safety.

• Adaptation: overcorrection—removal of attraction from the equation.

• Strength: emotional openness, verbal intimacy, curiosity.

• Growth edge: tolerating desire without catastrophizing loss.

His mistake was not lack of attraction. It was fear of what attraction might destroy.

The Dynamic

• She hid desire to avoid rejection.

• He hid desire to preserve connection.

• Both mistook suppression for maturity.

• Both experienced loneliness inside safety.

This is not an anxious–avoidant cliché. It’s a mutual protective standoff.

And this is why sex becomes such a charged symbol in modern relationships: it’s not about pleasure it’s about proof. Proof of desirability. Proof of safety. Proof of being chosen. Without attunement, sex carries too much weight. With attunement, it becomes expression instead of evidence.

Here’s The Bottom Line

What this film quietly teaches and what shows up daily in clinical rooms is this:

People don’t avoid sex because they don’t want it.
They avoid it because they are afraid of what it will cost.
And people chase sex not because they are shallow,
but because they are desperate to feel chosen— now.

Attunement is the only thing that dissolves both illusions.

What came up for you while reading this? I compiled some reflective prompts at the end of this article for your own processing.

• Attachment & Schema Theory: Early relational experiences shape core beliefs about desirability and safety; unmet needs often lead to suppression rather than expression (Bowlby; Young et al., Schema Therapy).

• Neurobiology: Dopamine drives motivation and reward; oxytocin supports bonding and emotional security (Carter, 1998; Feldman, 2012).

• Attunement: Secure attachment depends on accurate perception and responsive behavior, not intention alone (Siegel, 2010).

• Reenactment: Suppressed needs often reappear through displacement behaviors (e.g., food, casual sex, over-functioning) rather than direct communication (van der Kolk).

Reflection Questions:

Desire & Belief

1. When did you first learn whether or not you were “choosable”?

2. How do you know when someone wants you—what evidence do you look for?

3. Have you ever used desire (or sex) as proof of worth rather than expression of connection?

Sex vs. Intimacy

1. In your life, has sex ever felt safer than asking for what you actually need?

2. After physical closeness, do you feel more connected or more alone?

3. What does your body feel after intimacy, not just during it?

Protective Realism & Detachment

1. Where in your life do you present as “fine,” “chill,” or “unbothered” while quietly wanting more?

2. What desires have you minimized because wanting felt risky?

3. What would it cost you to admit out loud what you want?

Attunement

1. Do you feel chosen privately and publicly in your relationships?

2. When was the last time someone noticed something small about you and responded to it?

3. Are you waiting to be seen without ever saying what you need?

Expression & Suppression

1. What do you do with desire when you don’t feel safe expressing it relationally?

2. Where does your unmet longing go—food, work, fantasy, sex, withdrawal?

3. How do you know when you’re protecting yourself versus abandoning yourself?

Integration

1. What would it look like to hold both safety and passion at the same time?

2. What parts of yourself are you ready to stop hiding?

3. If you believed you were already worthy of being chosen, what would change?

References

The Mirror Has Two Faces
Streisand, B. (Director). (1996). The Mirror Has Two Faces. Columbia Pictures.
— Used as the primary cultural and narrative case study for attachment dynamics, desire suppression, and attunement.

Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.
— Foundational attachment theory informing bonding, safety, and relational regulation.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1979). Patterns of Attachment. Psychology Press.
— Empirical grounding for secure, avoidant, and anxious attachment patterns referenced throughout the essay.

Carter, C. S. (1998). Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23(8), 779–818.
— Evidence distinguishing dopamine-driven reward from oxytocin-mediated bonding.

Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Polity Press.
— Sociological framework for non-binding, disposable modern relationships (“liquid love”).

Murthy, V. H. (2023). Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
— Cited evidence supporting the claim that loneliness is a public health crisis affecting roughly half of U.S. adults, with health risks comparable to smoking and obesity.

Siegel, D. J. (2010). The Mindful Therapist. W. W. Norton & Company.
— Source for the definition and importance of attunement as accurate perception plus responsive action.

van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score. Viking.
— Supports discussions of somatic memory, reenactment, and nervous system-driven behavior.

Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide. Guilford Press.
— Clinical grounding for limiting beliefs, schema activation, and protective adaptations (“I am not chosen”).

Extended Reading & Viewing List

(For readers who want to go deeper into the themes of the essay)

Attachment, Desire, & Intimacy

• Johnson, S. (2008). Hold Me Tight. Little, Brown and Company.

• Levine, A., & Heller, R. (2010). Attached. TarcherPerigee.

• Tatkin, S. (2011). Wired for Love. New Harbinger.

Neuroscience of Bonding & Regulation

• Feldman, R. (2012). Oxytocin and social affiliation in humans. Hormones and Behavior.

• Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory. W. W. Norton & Company.

Cultural Critiques of Sex, Love, and Modernity

• Illouz, E. (2007). Consuming the Romantic Utopia. University of California Press.

• Illouz, E. (2012). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Polity.

• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together. Basic Books.

Mother–Daughter Dynamics & Projection

• Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love. Pantheon Books.

• Lerner, H. (1985). The Dance of Anger. Harper & Row.

• Forward, S. (1989). Toxic Parents. Bantam.

Embodiment, Desire, and Integration

• Perel, E. (2006). Mating in Captivity. HarperCollins.

• Perel, E. (2017). The State of Affairs. Harper.

Happy Saturday

Let’s have a chat about this past week’s Safari ride because the data from our trip is intel into our shadows.

I will link the video this article is referring to at the end of this essay.

Picture this.

You’re scrolling, minding your business, and suddenly a name appears. A name conditioned by your nervous system to mean threat.

You don’t think.

You salivate.

You comment.

You assume intent.

You project.

You moralize.

You scroll faster.

This isn’t a character flaw on your part.

It’s a form of conditioning and it’s Pavlovian, but instead of dogs and bells, it’s you and the algorithm.

Let’s dig deeper🔍

Pavlov’s Dogs, Meet the Algorithm

In Pavlov’s famous experiment, dogs were trained to salivate at the sound of a bell, that sound became linked to the arrival of food. So the dog developed the understanding bell means food, that right there is classical conditioning.

Perceptual Conditioning: How the Nervous System Learns Reality

Alrighty data collectors. To understand how conditional caregiving shapes adult perception, we have to step outside moral language and into learning theory. And Safari riders— this is the time to place your perception goggles off of default view mode network. Classical conditioning, first described by Ivan Pavlov, demonstrates that the nervous system learns associations automatically, outside of conscious choice. In Pavlov’s experiments, dogs did not “decide” to salivate at the sound of a bell. Their nervous systems learned through repetition that the bell predicted food. Over time, the signal itself became reality. This matters clinically because children & adults are not learning meaning through logic. They are learning through pairing.

Emotional Classical Conditioning

In human development, the “bell” is not a sound.

It is:

• A parent’s facial expression

• A shift in tone

• Emotional withdrawal

• Silence

• Praise paired with productivity

When a child repeatedly experiences:

• Affection + approval immediately following cleaning, helping, or compliance

• Emotional withdrawal or coldness immediately following noncompliance

The nervous system learns a pairing:

Productivity = connection
Rest / refusal / autonomy = danger

This is not a belief the child chooses. It is a conditioned perceptual reflex.

Just as Pavlov’s dogs salivated before food arrived, the child’s nervous system activates before rejection occurs anticipating loss of connection. The same way we anticipate loss of XYZ as adults and unconsciously sabotage good things.

Why Perception Becomes Rigid

Classical conditioning operates below cognition.

This is why, later in life:

• Neutral feedback feels threatening

• Boundaries feel like punishment

• Silence feels abandoning

The adult is not “overreacting.”

Their nervous system has learned:

These signals precede pain.

Conditioning is associative, not logical, counter-evidence does not immediately undo it. You cannot “explain away” a conditioned response any more than you can tell Pavlov’s dog to stop salivating by reasoning with it.

This is why reassurance often fails.

The body has already decided what is happening.

The same way people assign meaning and motive to strangers videos online simply because of their algorithmic patterns. Keyword—their.

Conditioning and the Illusion of Victimhood

When early conditioning pairs disconnection with danger, the adult nervous system begins scanning environments for threat.

This can manifest as:

• Chronic perception of being targeted or mistreated

• Hypervigilance to tone, expression, or silence

• Interpreting neutral events as personal attacks

It is also important to note. These process are not conscious forms of manipulation they are protector parts defending what the nervous systems has been conditioned to protect due to perceptual bias formed through that very conditioning. The nervous system is responding to old pairings, not present reality. The same way it responds to old blueprints in conflict with our partner. This is also why attempts to challenge the perception often escalate distress: because it gets interpreted as further evidence of threat.

Why Some People Collapse at Boundaries

Classical conditioning also helps explain the opposite phenomenon.

Children who were never paired with:

• frustration

• limits

• emotional rupture + repair

They did not learn that discomfort can be survived. So when adulthood introduces boundaries or consequences, the nervous system lacks a conditioned pathway for tolerance. (no crayons aka “skills”for this level, because those skills were never developed)

There is no “bell” that predicts repair.

Only danger.

So, the collapse that shows up is the evidence of unconditioned fragility.

Clinical Implication: Deconditioning Perception

Since these nervous system responses are conditioned, healing does not come from insight alone.

It requires:

• Repeated exposure to limits without abandonment

• Consistent pairing of boundaries with safety

• New associations between frustration and survival

In learning theory terms, this is not erasure it is extinction and replacement. The rewiring work that we do here in this corner of the internet. The old association weakens only when a new one is reliably experienced. Just like when trying to build new habits. You have to actually experience this new habits ignorer for them to imprint as new habits that replace the old ones. Until then, perception (the filtration system of our brains, that filters the information we download from the environment based on our internal lens and blueprints) will continue to override reason.

Why This Matters

When we frame these behaviors as character flaws, we miss the mechanism. We miss the patterns that are needed for this rewiring work to occur.

This is not about people being difficult.

It is about nervous systems that learned early:

Reality changes without warning.

And until perception is retrained through lived experience, the body will continue responding as if the past is still happening. So what occurred in the comments of our 3rd stop of the safari tour. (Instagram)

What happened in the comments wasn’t about ice. Nor was it about policy or ideology.

Making it about those is hijacking my entire corner of the internet. It was about what the name Renee Good triggered. When that name appeared, people’s brains immediately lit up and it wasn’t because of anything I said, but because Renee Good is now a conditioned cue tied to fear, identity, political frames, and deep emotional meaning. Her death was widely documented and shared online, and it became a symbol that activated a whole network of associations outrage, loss, injustice, tribal narratives, and pre-existing beliefs about state violence and race. So when that name was introduced into the conversation, many people weren’t engaging with the point I was making, they were responding to the affective charge attached to that name. Their nervous systems had already learned to react much like a Pavlovian conditioned response, because the topic touches on lived experiences, political identities, and collective trauma. They weren’t hearing my actual content about perceptual undercurrents; they were responding to what that name already meant emotionally to them.

That’s the pattern. It’s like everyone’s been trained to collapse into reactivity when the “signal” hits their nervous system, regardless of the context or relevance. Yours is no ice argument, no sideways deflection; it’s a classic example of how conditioned associations — a name, a symbol, a prior emotional investment — will hijack interpretation, distract from the original meaning, and create a whole new narrative that feels moral to them but has nothing to do with what you actually wrote. It’s the same way people weaponize parental dismissiveness or reflexively defend interpretations that don’t align with their already decided moral truth — they don’t argue the point, they defend the emotional architecture they’ve constructed around the cue. That’s why the conversation detoured: not because of logic, but because the brain salivated to react before it even registered the argument.

The most action out of all the videos, because people have been conditioned to collapse at the sight of their own projection of meaning while bypassing the original message. So now, the same logic that frames my work is supported all the sudden becomes” jarring” the moment a topic the public deemed as political comes up? Suddenly we are selectivity bypassing research on nervous system and neuroscience as a means to avoid our relationship with the algorithm.

What’s social media if not the modern bell?

🛎️ You see a name, a face, a tone, a topic, or even a color…

🛎️ Your nervous system rings the alarm.

🛎️ You react quickly, defensively, irrationally—before you even know why.

This is rehearsed survival. Your body is responding to training, not to truth which has multiple angles not just your own. But we as a collective don’t realize it despite the information out there. Why is that? Because scrolling became baseline for some many of us and that baseline created nervous system reactivity based on a curated algorithm that we consented too every time we log on. We argue psychology when these platforms were created with psychology in mind.

Comment Section Contracts (You Didn’t Know You Signed)

The moment you see someone online, your nervous system starts assigning contracts:

• They must speak softly.

• They must never say something that disrupts my bias.

• They must never mention mental health if it challenges a beloved public figure.

• They must reflect my pain, or they are a threat.

So when I say something neutral like, “If we care for Renée Good, can we talk about mental health?”—the contract breaks.

It has nothing to do with what I said.

But because of what your body was conditioned to feel when her name appeared. That’s why in this weeks Safari ride our third stop had a lot more comment activity. Because that’s how the algorithm works. It assessed my video took key words and sent it to the people it KNEW would react. How does it know that? Your behavior online that it is monituring. Your heart still bleeds, still aches for the events you keep clocking into.

But let me cognitively challenges us all.

It’s not about our hearts, it’s about her wife, her kids, the people who witnessed, the people who saw. This is how narcissim spreads. And when you have likes supporting your rightiousness to scream her name. While those involved are the ones whose days are altered because of this. THAT is the shadow work. And when VECNA comes you hate to see it— so what do we do? Flip it onto the messenger, make it about my minority status, my license, and your assumed intent—the noise.

And that discomfort (the 💩 we throw in shitty tennis matches) get's projected right onto me. Or baiting others into back and forth “debates.” See the pattern? Because it’s that very pattern that sends couples and families to therapy. How are clinicians suppose to help guide these turbulent conversations if people dictate the direction.

Nervous System Hijack, Explained

Let me say this plainly:

Your nervous system does not stop functioning when you enter a political conversation. It does not disappear when the topic makes you feel morally righteous. It does not excuse projection, cancellation, or character assassination.

When a trauma-trained nervous system perceives threat (even imagined), it will:

• Freeze or fawn (confuse safety with silence or loyalty)

• Fling blame toward the most available target (me, in this case)

• Rewrite the narrative to protect its own identity

This is what live reactivity looks like. It’s not what the eye can see, but what the body can feel. This is the training. Thats when we pull out our notebooks and get to data hunting 📓✏️

Subscribe now

DARVO, Deflection & My Chocolate Factory of Exposure Therapy

When you can’t sit with nuance, you:

1. Deny what was actually said

2. Attack the messenger

3. Reverse roles to become the victim

4. Over-identify with your perception as fact

That’s DARVO. And it’s everywhere online, in family systems, in breakups, and especially in comment sections.

Even when I speak from neutrality using metaphors, analysis, and years of clinical training the performance of moral superiority will hijack the room. The energy and you. You get swallowed up into the upside down.

“You should know better as a therapist.”

“You’re weaponizing your credentials.”

“You’re a minority, how dare you say that?”

What you’re really saying is:

“You didn’t reflect my pain the way I needed you to… so now you’re unsafe.”

Now where else in your life do you use that same muscle? 🔍 (This is the work)

It’s Not About Me. It’s About What I Mirror.

This platform has always been a mirror and no not in the gotcha culture kind of way. When some of you project that over here it's a little upsetting even for me. Because really? What benefit do I have trying to get people reactive and upset? How does that serve me?

My job isn’t to be liked.

It’s to be real, regulated— with milkdud animation, and rooted in nuanced truth. Let me be real here aside from making the content and doing all this work behind the scene. I have no idea what I am doing online and am learning as I go. Thinking I do this for my “brand” is a projection of your use and feelings towards these platforms.

I could have disguised myself as a talking tree but instead I showed up as myself.

And true transparency: I know my heart, what grief I hold for the world, and the services I give back to it. I will never explain or model that level of explaining to prove myself to people that are not apart of my real reality. I don’t want that for my clients, for myself, or for you. Fawning is now regulation. Over explaining only reinforces those who avoid and attack. That’s the sickness my work reveals in us all.

I have seen too many lives lost because of the streets of the algorithm. To many aches held to lose sight of my mission of this work. To train us to sit in discomfort without immediately cutting off, assigning blame, reacting whether internally or externally

You know, *insert giggle… I laugh because it’s “we love how authentic you are, keep being you!!” and then a trigger word is said and it’s “ no not like that” “ you’re a professional” “ you shouldn’t talk that way”

Do you think David Goggins cares when people tell him about his personality? Or how he speaks? When I was first introduced to his work that man scared me! 🤣 I thought “ why is he yelling at me” 🤭 It was until I got past the noise and reached his message that I could get passed the discomfort of my own projection of what his Goggins essence means. It is fascinating to experience how much people support you until your work touches something in them they don’t want to face. Then it’s watch your language, mind your tone, you’re a lady don’t speak that way.

My inner teen: “Says who?” 🤭

I joke my corner of the internet is the sacrifice

I model what happens when you:

• speak from neutrality

• blend soft tones with sharp clarity

• don’t back down when your nervous system says, fawn now or lose love

Love, in these corners, often comes with unconscious contracts “strings attached”:

• Only smile like this.

• Only critique that group.

• Only post soft, palatable healing.

• Only call out what I approve of.

When I don’t follow the contract?

🛎️ Salivation.

🛎️ Reaction.

🛎️ Mislabeling.

🛎️ Block and unfollow.

💥This Is Exposure Therapy

Every time you enter this corner and get activated by:

• My tone

• My neutrality

• My refusal to pick sides

• My ability to speak as Sav, not just a licensed therapist…

You are walking into a therapeutic field trip A Nervous System Safari where what gets activated in you is the curriculum. Again no— this is not me framing it this way to project defensiveness and internalized antiblack alksfhasjrbg;eorbg;er whatever noise… Stories some of the mob mentality members come up with. You can disagree but when you assume another’s intent from that disagreement that’s the very data in your behavior needed to be assessed by you!

Because this same behavior online…

Is how you treat your partner.

Is how you mishear your child.

This is how you collapse under discomfort in family dynamics. It’s also how you sign contracts for others based on how you feel. But that inner world is yours to manage not the outside people you outsource that work to.

From Projection to Reflection

Instead of saying, “I don’t support ICE” in response to a post that was never about ICE to begin with…

Pause.

Zoom out.

Ask: What did I make that post mean about me?

What bell did the algorithm ring?

Ask:

• Why did I assume this was a trap?

• Why did I respond like it was personal?

• Why do I believe certain topics are off-limits for someone with my skin tone, license, or personality?

I also am curious, why would people assume the same person you have been “standing by” is going to say something to be harmful on purpose? Can’t you see why so many have social anxiety these days? Y’all will turn on the very hand that feeds you just because you felt some heat and made meaning out of it declaring that meaning as universal truth. The video that got the most attention this week was the video that upset people the most. Guess what, we weren’t even in the conversation some took it too. That’s the trap…The portal back into the upside down even if it’s connected to rhetoric, politics, religion, etc.

None of that changes the fact our nervous systems our being trained by external forces outside of ourselves by undercurrents many are untrained to see.

That’s the conversation.

That’s the playground.

That’s the work.

The Brain Was Never Built for This

Through the gift of discomfort, we train the muscle required to allow the noise of the world even the ache of headlines, tone policing, and public projection—to move through us without becoming us. But let’s be clear: our brains were never designed to know what was happening all over the world at once. That is not what the human nervous system was built for. It was built to track what’s happening in your body, your home, your circle. your presence in that moment. And now it’s being force-fed crisis after crisis, betrayal after betrayal, accusation after accusation and then punished for not reacting the right way. You were conditioned to carry all of it. Not to care, but to react.

And the symptoms show up.

In your relationships.

In your anxiety.

In your burnout.

In your overexplaining.

In the way you collapse when misunderstood.

In how quickly you project an entire story onto a comment, a clip, or a face online.

All that overstimulation we call ADHD now? Yeah, that label ends up becoming a linguistic shortcut. Now all we have to do is just log it as ADHD instead of inquire about what’s happening internally to create the symptom that is showing up in the first place.

All of this creates nervous system hijack, not clarity not awareness.

The same nervous system that lights up when your mom walks into the room and ignores you, or when your partner starts a fight and somehow you end up apologizing.

It’s the same loop.

It’s the same muscle memory. And instead of seeing that loop the undercurrent I’m pointing to—it gets flipped onto the messenger. The focus shifts to the tone. Or the license. Or the “wrong” words. And that… that right there is the loop we’re rewiring. That’s the whole point. It’s not comfortable, but it’s also not off-limits just because your nervous system said so. Declaring something “off-limits” just because it activates you? That is control and we feel entitled to it. If we are not mindful that’s the very kind of narcissism born from a culture of algorithmic fawning and performance.

Now here’s my trip. My transparency.

I call this exposure therapy because I’ve never liked the algorithm to begin with. I actually despise what it’s done to people. What it’s done to our perception. How it flattens truth, twists communication, and trains people to emotionally gamble with every post, every comment, every thread. I didn’t enter this space because I love content. I did it because I wanted to make nervous system literacy accessible to the people, but also to me. What better way through felt safari experience.

Because let me tell yall ! 😩

I knew if I was going to walk into the lion’s den of unprocessed projection and pain, I had to do it as my full self. No character. No licensed avatar. Just Sav. The little milkdud and her brain she is sharing with you all. And it hurts when people twist your intent. Let’s not pretend it doesn’t. Especially when you’ve spent your whole life trying not to be misunderstood. Many of us were trained to shrink. To be overly kind. To contort ourselves just to avoid being misperceived. But that part of my nervous system? I don’t let her drive anymore. That muscle? I no longer exercise it. And what I’ve learned in the field notes is that some of y’all can’t stand a securely attached person who refuses to perform for your approval.

That’s because many of us are still out here performing.

To be picked.

To be chosen.

To be seen.

To be loved.

To be understood. But you don’t even do any of that for yourself. And so when someone like me shows up steady, direct, loving but not fawning your nervous system calls it a threat. You start attaching all these projections “You’re unaccountable.” “You’re harsh.” “You don’t care.” All because I didn’t cave or explain in the tone you demanded. All because I didn’t obey the contract you silently wrote and expected me to sign without reading. (The very thing we do to our loved ones)

Now here is the alarming part at least for me. Many of you are using therapeutic rhetoric to spiritually bypass your own shadow work. You’re misusing the words “projecting” “manipulation” and “accountability” to avoid what the mirror is showing you. You’re George-of-the-jungle swinging from word to word, hoping the psychology terms can carry you away from the discomfort I’m inviting you into. But let me ask you this—what do I get out of projecting? What do I gain from deceiving the public, from spending hours creating content, researching, citing, and filming… just to “manipulate, project or get defensive?” Where’s the logic in that? It’s odd how quickly people assign me an emotion. Ladies, y’all hate when your partner says “she has an attitude.” When they don’t like your tone. Same thing your mother did when you established a boundary.

Same nervous system. Same script. Same loop

And we keep getting stuck in it while gaslighting those aware, awake, and that can see clearly as the manipulators.

Getting pulled right back into the upside down.

Many of us are still training the muscle to see beyond what the eyes can see. To feel into the undercurrent. To observe what wasn’t said but was fully felt.

🛺🧙🏼‍♀️Buckle up, let’s field trip to a somatic journey through Case Study examples. Understand I have seen this behaviors across, cultures, faiths, and social classes. We are looking at human behavior not the subcategories we created humans to be in. Goggle up, Let’s zoom in🥽🔍

A father who doesn’t show up consistently for his kids shows up late—again. The school staff gives him a look. Not rude. Not even aggressive. Just neutral, but aware. He feels that undercurrent. He picks up on it. And what does he do? He explodes. “How dare you judge me!” Not because she judged but because he already felt the truth in the room. So explodes to avoid it… but wait… he doesn’t explode on the teacher he holds it in… he waits… then displaces that explosion on the partner. Why? Because no way he would do that performance publicly and tarnish his image.

That’s a man who has no regulation, but enough to encapsulate it until he is in the space or near the person who will allow that discharge. That’s a man who’s never been held accountable. So now, to avoid the shame, he turns it into a fight. And society might even label that moment as “bipolar” or “rage issues” or “anger management” when really, that was a nervous system collapse in a stew of emotional guilt. An emotion he may have never learned how to sit with and process as a child. The Mob of women who hate men right now will say “so he should grow up, he is an adult.” and my cognitive challenge to that is. Do you say the same thing to women?

Society always sees the undercurrents when it’s a man but what about a woman?

Example:

A woman was hurt—badly. A rupture that never got repaired or maybe even acknowledged. The kind that teaches the nervous system that closeness is dangerous and unpredictability is now a threat. She doesn’t walk around thinking “I’m traumatized.” She walks around thinking “I have to make sure this never happens again.” So she becomes anxious. Hypervigilant. She scans. She watches tone, timing, behavior. She doesn’t experience this as control. She experiences it as safety.

She starts regulating her anxiety by regulating her partner.

Who he can talk to.

Who he can see.

Where he can go.

Whether he can have social media.

What’s “appropriate.” What’s “disrespectful.” She calls it boundaries. She calls it protection. She calls it trauma-informed. When the partner reflects it back, names the control, the restriction, the imbalance—she collapses. Not into curiosity and not into reflection.

Into panic.

Tears.

Overwhelm.

Victimhood. “You’re attacking me.” “You don’t understand what I’ve been through.”

This isn’t because what her partner said was abusive but because it punctured the system that’s been keeping her regulated. That system was avoidance. That avoidance conditioned a nervous system to never learn how to sit with guilt or shame without needing someone else (outsourcing) someone to rescue it.

Now add kids to the mix.

The father. The grandparents. Extended family. Everyone learns the same rule very quickly: if we don’t comply, we lose access. So they tiptoe. They placate. They shrink. They absorb her emotional explosions soothes don’t lose access to the kids. The stay in the relationships as to not leave the kids alone with this woman. Because these same patterns. They are done to the kids too. And without realizing it, those very family members reinforce the pattern. Every time her anxiety explodes and the system rearranges itself around her, her nervous system learns: this works. Every time people silence themselves to keep the peace, her system learns: I don’t have to tolerate discomfort others will carry it for me.

Our mothers do this when they triangulate, our grandparents do this, people do this.

Understand, by the time of adulthood this may not always be conscious.

That’s the conditioning. The shame, guilt, etc is the sensational alert in the body guiding you to the source of the ache within. That’s the internal assignment for us all.

Now, I squirreled a bit let me get back on track…

This same woman goes to therapy convinced the problem is the partner. And early on, that makes sense because her pain is real. But when a competent therapist eventually names both sides of the equation the trauma and the control—the collapse happens again.

This time with accountability.

She deflects with tears. Trauma language. Victim storytelling. Not to deceive, no no no let’s make this clear. This is an unconscious process— the moment we get activated into accountability but more importantly activated into the exposure of facing and having emotional ownership of Guilt, Shame, Embarrassment etc… When we have never had to face those… We pufferfish 🐡, we activate, we spiral into nervous system tunnel vision to regain regulation for ourselves. In this example she knows the only way she knows how which is to explode, collapse, cry, etc.

This is puffer fish behavior folks. This is egocentric loops that can turn into vulnerable (covert) forms of narcissism. The form many of us want to turn a blind eye to because it reveals the parts of ourselves that check into the vulnerable narcissism hotel from time to time. This is how the nervous system attempts to regain narrative control. To preserve her image. To avoid guilt and shame that her system was never taught to metabolize. As a child, those emotional states were bypassed, never held. Because someone fixed it. Someone soothed it. Someone absorbed it for her. Or someone flat out avoided it and avoided the little her just like what occurred to the little him. So now as an adult, avoidance isn’t a choice. It’s the system.

People call this anxiety. Or “just trauma.” Or “empowerment.” What it actually is, is a nervous system that learned to externalize discomfort instead of tolerating it.

SSRT time.

Shit Sitting Reflection Time. The enforcement portal needed for us as humans to learn to sit in our shit and the discomfort that comes with it. When we don’t the house now becomes full of elephants. Everyone knows what can’t be said. Everyone knows what will trigger her. Everyone organizes their behavior around it. They survive around the dysregulation instead of through it. And because there are no natural consequences, no limits that are allowed to land—the pattern never rewires.

This occurs because no one ever taught her that she could survive the feeling she’s been running from her entire life. This is what we’re doing now in macro-level conversations. You think just because we’re talking about race or politics or systems that nervous system function suddenly disappears?

No.

Those same undercurrents live there too. But instead of acknowledging them, people weaponize identity, morality, or cultural status to skip the mirror. “Oh, she’s an elder, so we can’t challenge her.” “Oh, that’s a black parent, so they get to weaponize religion or silence you.”

No, loves.

Over time that becomes emotional abuse, and we are making this the norm culture just so we can avoid the discomfit that comes with having the conversation. These are the highways generational trauma rides on. And now the algorithm has learned how to mimic those same highways training you to react, to fawn, to accuse, to cut off—depending on who did it and how you feel about them. And that to me, is the most terrifying part. When your perception is hijacked, you think it’s discernment.

But it’s not.

It’s reactivity and the things that are happening in that reactivity. Are now being justified, bypassed and that’s the awareness we need to start bringing to mental health.

Final Reflection

This is the discomfort I sit in every time I show up to the corner to speak these truths knowing full well I will be misunderstood.

My Exposure therapy mission is learning to Let Them create the narrative without collapsing into fawning to be accepted and I model it publicly through my work and transparency moments. (the moments where I specifically tell you where I am at, not what you interpreted) If your nervous system was trained to mistake discomfort for danger, Then being in this corner might feel wrong at first.

But it’s not.

It’s repatterning in real time. Playground style!🛝☺️

And that’s exactly why this space exists.

So, how are we feeling?

Where are we at right now?

What are you carrying that you have been conditioned to hold that you are free to let go of?

What will you pick up for yourself now that the space within has been cleared?

That’s your homework.

Till next time data collectors.

Come as you are. Where you are. 🫶🏽

References

Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent–child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books.
→ Attachment, proximity-seeking, threat perception, early relational conditioning.

Bouton, M. E. (2007). Learning and behavior: A contemporary synthesis. Sinauer Associates.
→ Classical conditioning, extinction, replacement learning, cue-based responses.

Cozolino, L. (2014). The neuroscience of human relationships: Attachment and the developing social brain (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
→ Social neurobiology, co-regulation, shame, guilt, and nervous system learning in relationships.

Hill, N. (1937). Think and grow rich. The Ralston Society.
→ Concept of “drifting,” distraction, and loss of conscious direction (used metaphorically).

Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. Jason Aronson.
→ Splitting, projection, image preservation, shame avoidance, ego defenses.

Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.
→ Emotional dysregulation, invalidating environments, collapse under accountability.

Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford University Press.
→ Classical conditioning, cue-based learning, automatic nervous system responses.

Siegel, D. J. (2012). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
→ Integration, perception, bottom-up processing, nervous system hijack.

van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.
→ Trauma memory, somatic reactivity, past-as-present responses.

The Algorithm is loud but there’s a particular kind of silence I’ve been noticing. A silence that shows up when harm doesn’t match the usual narrative. Society today is quick to name harm when it’s a man harming a woman. We’re fast to diagnose, expose, and react often with moral clarity as if we saw the dynamic first hand. But.. What happens when harm flows in the other direction? Now what?
When the woman is the one silencing, stonewalling, manipulating, infantilizing…
When the father becomes the scapegoat or disappears out of fear or shame…

Suddenly the volume drops.
The curiosity fades.
The story changes.

And I think we need to talk about that.

Kristy Scott & Desmond Scott: The Cultural Case Study

As a clinician it’s been my due diligence to make sure I keep this noise from infiltrating my own perception. Once I am the session room, or placing my attention on the lives of other’s situations—what I think seizes to exist. I am a hunter, like a veloceiraptior hunting prey, except I hunt for the patterns that go unnoticed, unspoken, or completely bypassed.

I’m interested in how we respond to these narratives to these patterns.

So lets collect the data:

A woman files.
Says he cheated. (This is very important data) but what is more fascinating is how quick the internet believes her. Full stop.

Later, Desmond releases a statement—not denying the infidelity, but revealing that he asked for separation first. A subtle SOS embedded in his admission, one that of course gets bypassed but in the most invalidating way, this level of invalidation is mockery. Remember, we are a society that screams “Mental Health Awareness” just remember that… So, because the narrative was already set he cheated, she was betrayed—
there’s no space left for complexity or even nuance.

We say “believe victims” without vetting facts.
We say “create safe spaces” while treating someone’s public humiliation as viral entertainment. We say “be kind” while stitching and stitching and stitching our way into psychological warfare—all in the name of justice.

Now let’s really be honest:
There are influencers, celebrities etc, who don’t care about the grief, the trauma, or the nervous system collapse they care about the reward of aligning with the “correct” side. And now we’re being algorithmically rewarded for blind loyalty. Say the “right” thing, support the “right” person, and boom—you get the clicks, the validation, the exposure. Even if you don’t know the person. Even if you don’t care about the truth.
Just support the “side” and you’ll be included.

This isn’t about taking sides. It’s about how fast we choose one before asking questions. Nuance, critical thinking, discernment. These are crucial mind muscles that are necessary for a healthy nervous system and healthy attachment. We must learn how to train these otherwise the polarity poison from the upside down pollutes us all!!

The Somatic Safari Begins

This series is my way of thinking out loud—my brain hunches that I gather from therapy rooms, cultural patterns, nervous system data, and lived observation. You’ll often hear me say this is a mental gym, but it’s also a somatic field trip a safari ride through human experience.

Are you ready to begin?

As always we’re going to have to call on Doc for this one…

For the first stop on our Safari field trip, we have to go back in history. I don’t want to spend too much time in history because—well, we pull from historic wounds all the time in this generation. The sole reason for taking you this route is to refresh the memory. Many women, our mothers as children, grandmothers when they were children, so on had childhood experiences that didn’t have the safety to speak let alone held. Let your mind’s eye picture what it meant to be a woman in a prior generation—maybe the 1930s, 40s, 50s. Think about what it meant to have your worth directly tethered to how quiet you could be, how clean your home was, how compliant your children looked, how devoted you were to being small, selfless, sacrificial, and “seen but not heard.” Think about what it meant to have no bank account, no legal autonomy, no right to say no without consequence.

Yes, these are historical facts.
But more importantly they are psychological blueprints. In family systems terms (Bowen, 1978), this was role-based conditioning at its core. These women didn’t just accept their roles—they adapted to survive them. And survival adaptations, when repeated over time, become traits, coping mechanisms, patterns. Soon they develop into personality traits.

From Silent Wives to Strategic Mothers

Now, I want you to take this further. Don’t just see those women. Feel into them. Imagine what it takes to stay married to someone abusive because there are no resources to leave. Imagine what it feels like to lose a child to war and still be expected to cook, smile, and serve dessert.

Now ask yourself:
What kind of adaptations does the nervous system develop in that environment?

Fawning. People-pleasing. Emotional shutdown. Overfunctioning. Control masked as care, affection, love. Fragility that get’t masked as submission.
All of these are classic trauma adaptations (Herman, Trauma and Recovery)and when weaponized over time, they become covert control tactics passed down through generations. In The Drama of the Gifted Child, Alice Miller explains how children of emotionally repressed parents often become “mirrors” for the adult’s unmet needs.
That doesn’t go away just because the mother is “doing her best.” It gets coded into the emotional ecosystem of the home.

Somatic Checkpoint: Pause & Scan

So before we leave this historical stop on our safari Tour, I want you to check in with your body. What are you noticing?
Is there tension in your chest? A heaviness in the belly? A flutter in your throat?
What memories are flashing? What sensations are surfacing?

Pause.
That’s data.
We’re not judging it. We’re not labeling it.
We’re collecting it because what we don’t metabolize what the generations before us couldn’t metabolize—we often end up reenacting.

Back to the Now: The Inherited Survival Playbook

Okay, now we’re back. 2026. Present time. But are we really free from those patterns?

Because here’s what I’m seeing:

A whole generation of women raised under the unspoken rules of survival.
Where emotions were manipulated for attention.
Where silence was a form of protest.
Where tears could be turned on to deflect accountability.
Where shame was redirected before it was felt.
Where “I’m just a bad mom” or “You always think I’m wrong” was a way to shut down the conversation instead of sitting in it.

That’s the survival strategy being played out live!
And it’s one many of us were raised under. Janina Fisher (in Transforming the Living Legacy of Trauma) calls these “parts adaptations” — parts of the self that developed for protection, not connection. But when left unchecked, they become loops.
They hijack intimacy. They sabotage repair. They hide in plain sight.

I see them…

Can you?

Why Would That Stop at Motherhood?

Now ask yourself:

If those were the survival strategies modeled in the home…
What makes us think they would magically stop once someone becomes a wife or a mother? If anything, the nervous system may feel more unsafe in marriage.
More trapped. More visible. More needed. (Insert arranged marriage women)
All of this means, more vulnerable. So, when a nervous system feels cornered, it doesn’t reach for self-reflection. It reaches for what worked:
Covert control. Emotional redirection. Narrative flipping. Fragility. Defensiveness. Manipulative incompetence. These are not “toxic traits.” They are unmetabolized trauma loops we grasp for when we don’t have the crayons to use in that situational event. This is problematic because, when we fail to name them they become intergenerational inheritance.

And that’s what we’re here to interrupt.

Subscribe now

Clinical Lens: Generational Injury Doesn’t Skip the Boys

In Scattered Minds, Dr. Gabor Maté emphasizes that emotional availability and regulation are crucial in childhood—not just for girls, but for boys, too.

Yet boys are often raised with a split experience:

• Over-mothered (infantilized)

• Under-fathered (neglected or absent)

• Emotionally dismissed (“Man up”)

• Emotionally smothered (“He’s my whole world”)

Some daughters became shields.
Some sons became pawns.
Some got both.

I’ve worked with men who were raised by mothers in survival mode, covertly controlling, emotionally dysregulated, narratively manipulative.
This wasn't because they were “bad,” but because no one had taught them another way. Given them the what I call crayons to color life with. Remember, some of us were only give very few if any.

Now, Fast forward to the future… (I told you this was a field trip) those boys are noe men who carry the shame of collapsing as fathers.
They’re terrified of messing up.
They freeze when left alone with the baby and it’s not because they don’t care, but because their own nervous systems are still children.

And shame… is louder than logic.

Now let’s pause…

Because I can already feel some of the internal voices rising up. Some women reading this are saying, “Well, we didn’t get that either. We didn’t have support. We were scared too.”

And that’s the point.
We know.
We know you didn’t get that.
We know you weren’t mothered.
We know the system didn’t nurture your fear or guide you through your first time.

And still—you chose your partner. You said you loved him.
You stepped into this life with him, which means at some point, there was trust. There was intention. There was a “yes.”

So this… this is where love shows up.
This is where the vows get tested.
This is where we either pass down our blueprints or we interrupt the loop.Because when a man becomes a father, he’s not just hearing your voice.
He’s hearing his mother’s voice in his head, in his body. He’s hearing the tone of every woman who disarmed him with love but punished him with silence.
And yes, you are going through your own unraveling too. But that’s the part we forget: you’re both scared. You’re both brand new. And no one taught either of you how to do this with nervous system safety.

Do men need to step up?
Absolutely.
But how can they learn in an environment that shames them before it shows them? How can any of us? Parents…

Let’s be real. Most women didn’t get shown either.

Most women are entering motherhood terrified, overwhelmed, emotionally raw.
And that cocktail of anxiety, hypervigilance, and responsibility often leads to control. Why? Because control feels safer than chaos and many women confuse safety with control the same way their mothers, grandmothers etc did.

So what do we do?
We micromanage.
We take over.
We silently narrate: “You don’t know what you’re doing. I’ll do it.”
And the baby becomes a battleground for competence.

Now, Here’s the issue…
If the first message a man receives after becoming a father is “I don’t trust you,”
don’t be surprised when he shrinks.
When he defers.
When he stops trying.
When his nervous system says, “See? I knew I couldn’t do this.”

That’s not him weaponizing incompetence.
That’s his trauma saying, “You’re right. I’m not safe here.”

And that’s the setup for the very problem we claim we didn’t sign up for.

When we say, “Why won’t he help with the baby?” Well… maybe it started the moment he tried and felt like a burden. Maybe he started clocking the eye rolls, the corrections, the side comments. Maybe his freeze response activated because his nervous system got paired with your disapproval instead of your belief.

This is not about blame. This is about wiring. Making it about blame proves your nerves systems need to be the victim. Were you raised under that? The minute the baby enters the world, a new energetic contract is written and both partners bring their nervous systems into that contract. If we want fatherhood to feel like a safe identity for men, we need to ask:
How am I showing up in those first moments, those first weeks, those tiny ruptures?
Am I reinforcing his fear of failure?
Or am I modeling what repair looks like?

Because your regulation—or lack of it—is now shaping two generations.

Weaponized Accountability, Cultural Projection, and the Scapegoat Complex

A lot of us were raised in systems where being accountable was a survival strategy, especially if you were the scapegoat. You learned to take the blame to keep the peace.
To carry the dysfunction so the family didn’t collapse. So now, as adults, when someone calls us out—we’re not just hearing feedback. We’re hearing danger.

But here’s where it gets tricky: Some people only demand accountability from others to avoid doing their own work. They perform call-outs as a form of power not as a path to healing. They weaponize “insight” as a form of shame-displacement.

And some of us grew up with people like that.

So when we say we fear “being corrected,” what we’re really afraid of is being abused again under the guise of accountability. This is why we have to build new emotional ecosystems.

What I call The Rules.

These must include not just safe spaces but mature ones. Spaces that distinguish between a call-out, a correction, and a conversation.

What We Don’t Clean, We Pass Down

We talk a lot about the “mother wound.”
But what about the mothering wound in men? What happens when boys are raised by women who never processed their own grief, shame, fear, or trauma? What happens when emotional enmeshment gets mislabeled as love? When the son becomes the therapist, the emotional husband, the emotional hostage? And what happens when these boys grow up, try to become fathers, and no one has trained their nervous systems to tolerate the identity of being needed?

Some collapse.
Some disappear.
Some rage.
Some cheat.
Some distract.
Some shut down.

Now, our safari is about to hit some bumpy terrain as we pivot perspectives and explore the area of mens impacted development. Because what we’re seeing now is the result of those dynamics we already named. Some of these men?

They were infantilized.
Some? Parentified.
Some? Both.

And when boys are raised like this, they often go one of two ways.

They either become submissive, passive, shut down or they become aggressive, controlling, manipulative. There’s rarely a third path without deep inner work and external reparenting.

Let’s start with the first one.

You’ve probably seen the collapse.
The freeze.
The stonewall.
The delayed routines. The disappearing acts right before breakfast.
The drawn-out trips to the bathroom every time bedtime starts.

Let’s Zoom Out.

This is regressed child behavior. Think about kids who stall when they don’t want to do something. This isn’t just irresponsibility, it’s the nervous system stalling, it’s nervous system movement. It’s fawn and freeze patterns wrapped in “I don’t know how” and reinforced by a partner who keeps saying, “You’re doing it wrong.”

Think about it. If men are always doing it wrong when will they ever do it right to your standards? Do you even have standards? Or is being constantly unfulfilled a baseline personality trait that creates a double bind not just for your husband but also for your kids? A reenactment of your mother’s moods maybe?

But then there’s the second path.

The one that doesn’t look like collapse.
It looks like dominance.
It looks like gaslighting.
It looks like a man who makes his partner feel small, confused, doubting her own sense of reality—because that’s what he had to do to himself to survive his own upbringing.

This is often when narcissism enters the chat, not as a personality disorder right away, but as a pattern of delusion required to maintain a sense of self. It’s not that he wants to lie or manipulate. It’s that he was never allowed to just be.
And when you’re raised by a mother or any caregiver for that matter who emotionally hijacks every moment, who re-centers everything around her pain, her emotions, her shame—you learn to do the same, because it’s the only way you ever got attention, safety, or identity. We must not confuse these with “skills.” These are maladaptive survival patterns.

If we never pause to name them, we start reinforcing them.
We start dating them.
We start building families with them.
And then calling it fate when it falls apart. So many women are in relationships with men like this men who are drowning in shame but performing control.
Men who seek validation through cheating, flirting, overworking, or status, because it’s the only way they know how to feel good enough. Now here’s the thing…
A lot of those women are reenacting their own wounds, too. They choose these men because the dynamic is familiar. Because it matches what their nervous system was raised on. And that’s not chemistry.
That’s trauma. That’s your past recycling itself.

All of this doesn’t excuse anything. We name to interrupt the reenactment.

Macro-Micro Loop: Is Culture Conditioning the Family, or the Other Way Around?

Here’s a hypothesis I’ve been sitting with:

We are fed narratives.
Who deserves empathy.
Who should be forgiven.
Who is always safe.
Who is always harmful.

When was the last time you asked yourself… “Where did we get these blueprints from?” Who told us we had to chase perfection, be the “good wife,” raise the polite child, and suppress our mess?

Advertising did.
The church did.
The state did.
The neighborhood did.
The PTA did.

Marketing campaigns didn’t just sell us products—they sold us identities.
They sold us what safety was supposed to look like and then punished us for not achieving it. But what happens when modern influencers are perpetuating a life that not even they are living? This is why discernment skills are so important.

The deeper truth: We don’t have to keep reenacting any of it, and that is terrifying for some of us. We don’t have to let the algorithm of our nervous system or society decide our values. We don’t have to choose between family conditioning and cultural messaging. We can choose something else: We can choose alignment. That’s what this whole field trip is about. Not burning down the system, but getting honest about whether it’s been living in our bodies this whole time and the necessary rewiring work needed rewire what’s been imbedded within our system.

Closing Thought: The Shame You’re Avoiding Is the Growth You’re Delaying

Let me say this plainly:

I’m not here to argue that all men are victims. I’m not here to suggest women can’t be harmed. I’m not here to “both sides” real abuse. I’m here to say that our perception filters… You know the ones shaped by pain, family roles, culture, and shame— yeah, those filtration systems often prevent us from seeing the full picture.

And that blindness…
hurts our kids.
hurts our partners.
hurts our healing.

More importantly hurts ourselves.

The shame you’re avoiding isn’t dangerous.
Sitting with it is the real work.

That’s the hypothesis.
I’ll see you on the next field trip.

🎵Music: “Etc…”- Franz Gordon

Licensed via Epidemic Sound

Data Collectors,

Wow, we made it through another year. The feeling Dec 31st gives (at the time of writing this) while simultaneously providing the same level of confusion because time is a construct anyways, yeah? It places time in perspective, that regardless something is moving, people are changing, getting older passing on. There is no escaping that reality for some of us. Every year I hear the same thing “ I can’t believe how fast this year flew by.” Is it that we can’t believe it, or that we have been go, go, going so much we don’t have the time to pause and take it all in?

Leave a comment

I’m not a political person.

I’m a pattern-noticer though and lately, this pattern I am noticing is impossible to ignore. Everywhere I look, people are waking up with the same quiet sense of unease—like something is off, but no one can quite name it. The noise is loud. The outrage cycles fast. The stories change daily. And yet, beneath all of it, the same feeling lingers: Something isn’t adding up. I can feel it— the weight of the collective. I’ve been able to feel this since I was a child. This intensity feels like a curse at times, but a blessing at others. It’s why I believe I was guided to this field, this career, but bloody hell.

As Marty McFly would say…

Subscribe now

People are starting to SEE! Or at least I hope so… I pray so…

There are billions in money being fraudulently earned, mysteriously lost. Money we are told we don’t have— just disappears? And when we ask about it we are made to feel we are the problem? Institutions are contradicting themselves. Systems are demanding obedience while modeling hypocrisy and deflecting when we start catching on. Any of this sound familiar to you yet? It’s giving “do as I say, not as I do…”Instead of questioning the structure, we’re encouraged to fight each other.

Left.

Right.

Up.

Down.

Black.

White.

Queer.

Straight.

Man.

Woman.

Labeled. Sorted. Pitted against one another.

This is not accidental. HA! Come on, people! Do you really think this is accidental?!?

🎶📝Homework time: Musical experience.

Before we dive in let me touch up on Double Entendres.

Double entendres: Phrases that carry two meanings at once. They are one of my favorite tools for nervous system awareness. They reveal the split screen we’re all navigating. Take Kid Cudi’s lyric: “Don’t fuck up the feng shui.” Depending on your lens, that’s either a reminder to protect your peace—or a warning to stay silent and not disturb the illusion.

It’s both.

That’s what makes it powerful. That’s what makes it dangerous. Because sometimes what looks like peace… is just control with a celebrity face attached. And sometimes what feels like disruption… is actually your nervous system finally telling the truth. Double entendre moments are where your body speaks louder than your brain. Your job isn’t to choose the “right” interpretation. Your job is to notice which one your body believes and ask why.

For my older gens, bear with ya girl, okay. This may not be your genre but that’s ok. Get your headphones, pull up the lyrics, and listen to the music. (Better yet, I’ll make it easier and place the video in this article for you.) Listen to the song and FEEL what Kid Cudi & André Benjamin are trying to tell you here… This isn’t about what your mind tries to distract you with about the artist, their personal life or what you think you know about it— that’s not the HW. That’s noise. The HW is to listen to the experience of the song while you see the lyrics and allow your body to make the meaning. THAT’S true somatic work, using your sense of hearing and feeling (somatic) the music as the portal into your body’s communication.

Everyone’s body will tell them something different. The point is not to debate that data but to alchemize it like the Fabel Stone Soup. We have some time so let me unpack what I mean here.

This is where I let you all into my brain, and I sure hope you see the method to my madness.

In the original stone soup story:

• A hungry traveler convinces a skeptical village to each contribute one small thing (a potato, a carrot, a pinch of salt) to a pot of “stone soup” he’s pretending to cook.

• At first, everyone claims they have nothing to give.

• But one by one, they bring what little they have and together, they create something nourishing that no one could’ve made alone.

Music as Stone Soup: Everyone Brings Their Story

What I’m asking you all to do with this music activity is to listen to music through the nervous system, not the ego.

• One person might hear Kid Cudi and feel grief.

• Another might feel a memory of their father.

• Someone else might feel free.

That’s the point.

The goal isn’t to debate the data your body gives you.
The goal is to contribute it.

Your nervous system responds— even if it seems small— it is your ingredient. Your contribution to this psychological nervous system flavored stone soup.
When we each bring what we have (our felt experiences, our lyrics, our emotional data), we create collective soup. A shared understanding richer than anything we could cook up alone.

So why does this matter?

I think the correct question to ask is

Why doesn’t this matter.

It matters clinically, and here is why. When we’ve been gaslit, our amygdala becomes hypervigilant:
– Is my story valid?
– Am I being attacked again?
– What if I get misread?

But when we engage in this kind of somatic, reflective music practice outside the arena of debate, we start retraining our nervous system to understand from US, ourselves. Not the noise from the echo chambers. The silent inner voice that has been drowned out by everything else. This voice reminds us:

You are not in danger here.
You don’t need to fight for your story to be true.
We are not deciding whose memory is right.
We’re honoring what each body remembers.
We are not debating. We are building soup.

This is co-regulation through contribution.
This is stone soup for the soul and boy oh boy am I optimistic about humanities ability to wake up. I know, I know. It’s a slow drip… but I feel the collective awakening.

I know I sent you down the long route to start the homework but I must explain my madness to you. I mean we are still getting to know each other. Here is the link to the song. Enjoy … (Come back to me and tell me what messages came to your consciousness after you try this.)

(Kid Cudi – By Design) I have embedded the Spotify link below. I do have lack of trust in technology so we shall see if it works ok.

Okay, Let’s continue.

This is what happens in dysfunctional families and nations when truth becomes too threatening to face. The same way it’s too threatening when our own parents won’t face it. Yes, older gen—this goes for you too!! I hate calling you older gen because it’s not about age here. I speak to the inner children within us all, regardless of how long you have walked this earth. This work is about pattern recognition and understanding it all started somewhere.

The Family System at Scale

In family systems theory, when there is unresolved trauma or unacknowledged harm, the system doesn’t heal, it reorganizes around avoidance.

Someone becomes the scapegoat.

Someone becomes the hero.

Someone becomes the problem.

Someone holds the shame everyone else can’t bear to hold or be bothered with. Those of us I call: shit catchers, those of us that follow the rules, over function to make sure we don’t create issues for anyone. While the avoidant, no self-awareness people get away with half-assery.

Many avoidants struggle with overstimulation because the things they were able to avoid and be unaccountable for in childhood now show up with natural consequences as an adult. That can be very overstimulating for a person that has never seen the natural consequences of life simply because their parents didn’t want to be bothered with the cognitive dissonance required to hold and maintain boundaries. EVEN if, as an adult, you were enabled—eventually, what’s in the dark comes to light, and those who have played the role as the shit catchers of your avoidance. They will reach their window of tolerance with you and you will feel it. The real issue here, which is the original wound—gets deflected, then creates the secondary injury. Remember that original issue? Probably not, because it’s by DESIGN to distract you from it…

But that original issue remains untouched.

Now, field trip time… let’s zoom out.

What happens in families happens in cultures.

When a system cannot tolerate accountability, it redirects discomfort downward or outward. It creates distractions. It manufactures conflict. (Stir the pot, Vecna energy)

It teaches people to fight each other so no one looks up. This is not conspiracy.

This IS psychology. And just like the system we live inside of, even when those trained in psychology name this pattern, we are cast as the enemy— gaslighted by the same hands who told us we can trust them. We are watching a collective trauma response play out in real time.

The Illusion of Choice

We are told we are divided by ideology.

By party.

By identity.

By belief.

But what we are actually divided by is fear and the fear is being managed.

When people are overwhelmed, dysregulated, and exhausted, they cling to narratives that give them certainty, even if those narratives harm them, isolate them from those who truly care and are safe, and place them in reenactments that just because they feel comfortable— doesn’t mean they’re safe.

The nervous system seeks safety before truth.

So:

1. We argue about symbols while systems quietly consolidate power.

2. We fight online while real decisions are made elsewhere.

3. We turn on each other because connection feels too dangerous.

It’s the same dynamic you see in families where accountability was never modeled. Children learn to survive by aligning, deflecting, or disappearing.

Can you see yet?

Share

The Collective Freeze

What we’re witnessing isn’t mass ignorance. It’s a collective-level of dissociation. Just like children in emotionally volatile, unstable, or unpredictable homes start to behave in what I call dissociating into distractibility—that’s a survival response, not a brain disease! The brain was rewired into that function mode because of the environment. So, if neurons that fire together wire together and we can accept but then reject the same logic when it suggests you could unlearn or rewire. This contradiction leaves me in a low simmer crash out…

Then the ADHD mob comes for my guy Gabor Maté because he so gently gives the public insight you don’t want to hear… but why???

I know why.

Because what’s the payout?!?

Right now, many get to use their ADHD as the consistent explanation for behavior they never actually change. They just continue to name it and people— they are sick of it. So what do they do? They give up having to deal with it. That giving up, is the reinforcement that makes this behaviors and lack of accountability and informed integration continue and get worse. The more society ignores and turns a blind eye, the more it reinforces mental health diagnoses and trauma being used as explanations only, deflecting from accountability. Even if people deny that’s what they are doing, it’s still being done. So why is there so much denial, gaslighting, avoidance of accountability? I watched so many people during my time back home in California dodge owning the fact that they are inaccurate simply because ego. Many don’t want to feel dumb, embarrassed, guilty, or shame. Those emotions don’t hurt us. They are not a threat to our lives if we have to surrender to them.

We have been dragged, dude. I mean, I get it. But giving up is an independent decision. You can’t make everyone else responsible for putting up with what you tolerate due to lack of believing you are worthy of more and worthy of boundaries. People aren’t daft. They’re overwhelmed.

Overstimulated.

They’re underpaid.

And they are trying to survive.

They are watching others do illegal activities or even sell their soul to get by, and the system reinforces it—the same way MOMS, you watch your sons abuse women, the mother of your grandkids, because you are afraid.

And listen, you aren’t weak.

You were born in a time where women did not get to get away with having the mouths they have today. I say that because I have one. 🤭 Meanwhile, down here in the micro—we shame each other. It’s like the coaching industry.

I can’t hate the player; you gotta hate the game. There are people paying thousands to those with no license, no governing board, nothing. What happens when they mess up with the wrong one? Now what?

Society has revealed degrees don’t mean shit at this point. (Yes, it’s an overgeneralization, but let me be a bit dramatic here, okay? 😩)

Having a license doesn’t mean you’re a good therapist—that’s the nuance.

But when you see a society allow unethical behavior while simultaneously encouraging people to give their years and money to an education system that only traps them in debt and can’t guarantee them a job…Meanwhile, someone with the balls enough to just start from literally nothing but the thought to do it and then makes thousands—while licensed professionals make dust compared to that.

It’s not about coaches.

It’s about what people get away with in a selectively avoidant system.

And when you have a population in survival, it’s easy to get compliance from them. All you need is a spicy sprinkle of FEAR.

Data Collectors:

When stress exceeds our capacity to process it, the brain goes into protection mode:

– Fight

– Flight

– Freeze

– Fawn

As a collective, we are frozen and fragmented.

In that state, it becomes easier to:

• Point the finger and Blame neighbors instead of systems

• Attack each other instead of asking hard questions

• Seek certainty & comfort instead of truth

This is how power maintains itself without ever having to raise its voice or a hand.

(Over here in El Paso, a chancla 🩴😂)

The selective awareness of it all, is plastered all over the algorithm with your “how to make passive income…” talk. So you know how this works. This is how they passively maintain control, simply because we humans refuse to see the power we have innately inside of ourselves by utilizing discernment and critical thinking.

Hunger Games

Divergent

The Matrix

The movies been trying to tell us something… are you paying attention?

But wait a minute…

Are they trying to tell us or show us???

The Real Threat Is Connection

Here’s the part that matters, because it’s why division works.

But first, I am going to take the scenic route to get there—bear with me okay. Just like in a family system where one or both parents are abusive, emotionally neglectful, unavailable, etc. Siblings in these environments typically are not treated the same.

Why is that?

Well, my theory is, because some parents can’t balance both or all of the children at once. So, if they have half on their side and half on the opposing side—to them, it’s balanced. Remember: if this doesn’t make sense to you, it’s because you are thinking like yourself and not like the people with these neural pathways for roads they choose to take. Okay?

You can’t wear your shoes in another’s experience and then gaslight them. That you can’t see what they express. No. Take your shoes off and put theirs on…

Ahh… you see?

Now walk in them 😉.

If I am a parent who has conflict with one kid and I want to maintain power…

Well, I treat the other child(ren) positively to build an alliance. That alliance is not authentic because it is built purely for control—and for the child(ren), purely to survive and not be on that parent’s radar. Do you see how compliance causes unconscious harm to others when you are in an egocentric loop of survival?

Example: Siblings who were conditioned to not be close due to the family environment they grew up it. The siblings uniting together would make the mom insecure because she would feel they were talking about her. The issue here is. first kids, especially siblings are allowed to be connected and talk about whatever they want. A parent insecure about that dynamic may struggle with egocentricism. but if it becomes so profound hat the parent collapses anytime to children even as adults spend time without the parent present. This is narcissism, I see this a lot in elder women— especially those that belong to rigid cultures that teach sameness and anything else is wrong. That polarity runs through their blood. They then place all of that avoided tangled yarn of emotional grief and hand it to their kids to sort through for them. This is when the older generation causes unintentional harm. It always recenters them. Even their Childs truth, feelings, version of the story gets hijacked and recentered around them. This is narcissism.

It’s not about blaming or shaming here. I name because I am trying to help you see! Our brains are overstimulated. Everyone is ADHD now, not because they are. But because they have been gaslighted, manipulated, dragged… for years by a society they thought had their best interest. A Governement that was suppose to have our best interest.

The same way we feel grief that never get’s a funeral for the moment we realize our parents are not the emotionally safe places that life says we are supposed to have.

Well, who is Life and when did they say that?

Exactly…

Our parents, and their parents, and the parents before that.

Are you kidding?

They couldn’t possibly know.

There was no language for this shit.

There was no awareness, no marches.

Society today? We have ALL of that yet people still scream “no access” from their smart device. You can’t see what you don’t utilize. Many refuse to integrate the very things they can name, but punish everyone else for their lack of integration practice.

Can’t you see…

It’s not even about being traumatized anymore.

We are so enabled as a society!!!

So now, if we are challenged…We feel personally attacked rather than seeing it as love. Let’s be real for a second. In a society of ghosting, because people don’t have the cojones to be an adult and say what it is they need to say respectfully. Having someone in your life give you feedback from intentional effort knowing how scary and uncomfortable that is because of how quick people perceive everything as an attack. But also because it’s the very skill you avoid, that is something that needs to be named.

But also examined.

It highlights how even now, when love is in front of us, we reject it because it doesn’t look or feel the way the algorithm told us it would.

But discernment understands Sav- Me, Hi! I share this not to harm, but to provide perspective and discernment training. If people across identities began talking to each other, really talking—

Not gossiping

Not debating

Not posturing

Not performing

If they compared notes…

If they named shared patterns…

If they realized they were experiencing the same manipulation through different doors…The spell would break.

Like the demise of the hive mind which is a collective consciousness where individual members don’t operate independently — they’re mentally or behaviorally linked to a central controlling entity (often a queen). Think Vecna.

When the queen dies, the network collapses.

The fight is over…

Now what?

That right there. That is the real fear.

Not disagreement.

Not dissent.

But unity that is rooted purely in awareness and love that is rooted in surrender/felt safety. All while implementing understanding and radical acceptance. None of this is being used to control anyone—but to allow.

To just be.

That’s the difference. That’s the antidote.

A Final Truth

This isn’t about left vs. right, if you haven’t read the room. If it went over your head and you are stuck in the booty-tickled entanglement that Vecna has you in…

That’s okay.

You might not be ready to digest all this yet. I understand, I tend to say a lot Costco style, but take it from someone who works with all ages, across many state borders, many cultural lines. Held many laughs, shed many tears, and held many uncomfortable and challenging conversations of truth, even with generations before me who would be deemed unreasonable. I have sat at the table and been welcomed into the homes and families of many. Trust me when I say this:

It’s not about ideology.

It’s not about who’s “awake” or “asleep.”

It’s about whether we’re brave enough to tolerate the discomfort of seeing the system as it is without needing to make someone else the villain for naming it. Because, once people start seeing clearly, and start asking better questions, we are able to stop fighting. We’re able to pivot and hold multiple truths at once and not “what about me” everything that doesn’t center us or our pain. We can hold multiple truths, multiple angles to events that have affected us all. And you are able to hold those angles with nuanced discernment because you learned: It’s not about having everything in life center you, your ache, your wounds. It’s about remembering our stories are what bridge us together, and togetherness is what humanity needs to survive.

Division can’t be an option. Not anymore, Not in today’s emotional climate. Especially for those of us in America. I am doing what I can to help bridge that gap.

What are you doing to bridge it?

—Sav

I hope you all take a moment of intentional pause this evening as you welcome in the new year.

Want to Go Deeper?

The Expanded Assignment (including a guided journaling page, nervous system check-in, and music decoding map) is available for all paid members inside our private sanctuary.

🎟️ Join the membership to access:
– bonus reflections
– printables + worksheets
– voice-notes/ podcast
– and lives where we check in with each other and what we are navigating. plus more to come.

Join The Sanctuary!

Are you ready to start rebuilding our inner feng shui?

Let’s get to work😎

Sanctuary members… I will meet you inside.

Read more

How are you?

As we approach the holidays and face the many opportunities for nervous system exposure therapy. 👏🏽 This Protocol will surely be of use for you. A quiz will be provided at the end of this article. When you pass— you will receive your reinforcement.

Let’s get into it…

How to Stop Emotional Time-Traveling (and Come Back Into the Room)

Your mind starts sprinting while your body locks up. Your breath gets shallow.
Your chest tightens. Your shoulders brace. Your muscles hold tension as if something is about to hit you even though nothing in the room is actually happening. If you’ve experienced this, you’re not alone. Your amygdala has you time-traveling, But unfortunately not with Doc and the DeLorean— with your trauma and the physiological response that comes up with it.

What Is Temporal Flooding?

Clinicians often refer to this as temporal flooding, it occurs when the nervous system collapses the past and future into the present moment. It’s the embodied experience of reliving memory while simultaneously bracing for imagined threat. Good ol’ cognitive dissonance. Stephen Porges’ Polyvagal Theory explains this through autonomic cues of safety and danger: your system doesn’t wait for logic to assess the threat, it prepares to survive based on sensation and memory alone. Lisa Feldman Barrett calls this “the prediction machine” of the brain: it fills in emotional meaning before sensory data has even caught up. Then we have Bessel van der Kolk describes this as time collapse, where the body reacts as if a past wound is happening in that present moment— even if you are objectively safe. Dr. Dan Siegel’s integration model shows what happens next: without internal coherence, the system slips into chaos or rigidity, unable to flexibly respond to what’s in front of you. This is what is occurring all over society as we speak. Little puffer fishes and aunt Marges floating in the atmosphere dysregulated due to lack of self-awareness and accountability. Can you picture this? Imagine a bunch of aunt Marges causing secondary injuries in families everywhere because their dysregulation leaks out and infects others.

You’re Not Lacking Insight. You’re Lacking a Protocol

Most adults were never given a procedure for these moments. We forget this. Many of the generations before us were not given awareness language and the safety to speak.
There were no grounding hacks. No motivational Pinterest quotes and affirmations.
There wasn’t therapists providing strategies such as “try journaling.”

Nothing.

No real protocol.

One we should’ve learned at 10.
Practiced at 15.
Relied on at 20.
Mastered by 30.

But no one gave it to us. So we learned to regulate through control the same way those who raised us learned. The problem with this is… You are seeing the repercussions of coloring life with these out dated crayons.

Through:

Control the tone.
Control the conversation.
Control the outcome.
Control your partner. Your child. Yourself. We do these behaviors not because we’re controlling. (Some of us are and I can name that…)But because you didn’t know how to stay in the fire without burning someone else. The practice many of us avoid.

The SOP Protocol (Standard Operating Procedure for the Overwhelmed Nervous System)

This is the three-step protocol I teach in my clinical work and inside The Safety to Speak™.

Each step builds on the last.

1. PAUSE — Somatic Awareness + Emotional Inventory

2. ZOOM OUT — Cognitive Distance + Data Collection

3. INTEGRATE — Choice + Nervous System Leadership

This is not about becoming quieter.
It’s about becoming steadier.

Let’s break each one down.

STEP ONE: PAUSE

The First Muscle

Pause is not just “take a deep breath.”

Pause means locating the internal buildup before it becomes behavior.

It’s the moment you notice:

• jaw clenching

• chest tightening

• stomach dropping

• leg buzzing

• thoughts racing faster than your mouth can keep up

This is somatic data — the language of your survival system.

From a clinical perspective, this builds:

• Interoception (the ability to notice internal cues)

• Window of Tolerance (the range you can stay regulated inside)

• Impulse Inhibition (your capacity to delay reaction)

This is real-time exposure to your own body’s alarm. You are learning to stay with it long enough to collect information instead of obeying it.

STEP TWO: ZOOM OUT

The Loop Interrupt

This is the moment metacognition turns on.

Metacognition = the ability to observe your thoughts and feelings without fusing with them.

This step helps you separate:

• Body alarm

• Emotional memory

• Predictive story

Ask yourself:

• Is this a thought, a feeling, or an urge?

• Is this about now — or then?

• Am I responding as my current self — or as my wound?

These questions interrupt reenactment.
They create space. This is how you stop emotional time-traveling without abandoning yourself.

STEP THREE: INTEGRATE

The Decision Point

Integration is the return.
Your body has re-entered the room.

You’re back online.

Now you choose:

• Do I delay the conversation?

• Do I reflect aloud, but with a grounded tone?

• Do I pause and co-regulate before proceeding?

This is the work of neuroplasticity.

Your brain will default to what it’s done before. Unless you interrupt it and practice the new pattern again and again. Integration isn’t about perfection.
It’s about integrity.

This Is Why You Need Reps, Not Motivation

You don’t need to “be better.” That is a quick trap into toxic productivity loops that get us doing everything but what we actually need to practice.

The world gives us plenty of opportunities to get these reps:

• Social media comments

• Family friction

• That look your partner gave you

• Your boss’s tone

• A stranger’s silence

• Your child’s tantrum

Most people try to avoid these moments, But when you do that you only avoid moments of closeness with yourself. This protocol teaches you to train inside those moments. Not perfectly, remember it’s not about that, it’s about learning how to do it without collapse that doesn’t teach suppression.

It teaches discernment.

The Worksheet (and Why There’s a Quiz)

There’s a printable multi page worksheet that walks you through this SOP. BUT before you download it, you’ll be asked to complete a short quiz. This is not to gatekeep, but to ensure you’re participating in the learning with intention not just collecting documents. One of the questions is open-ended. That’s intentional. There is no right or wrong in that area. Your answers are part of my ongoing ethnographic research on nervous system regulation, emotional conditioning, and embodied choice.

This entire corner of the internet is a playground.
You’re not being graded.

But you are being invited to grow.

Are you Ready?

Catch the full video over on YouTube. I will embed that video below…

If this work resonates, subscribe and stay close.

Become A Paid Sanctuary Member Here

Starting in the new year, I’ll be going live and Sanctuary members won’t just attend, they’ll help curate what we explore together.🥳 The questions you keep circling, the moments that made you pause, the patterns you can’t unsee… that’s the material here. I’ll be waiting for you in the sanctuary.

I hope you all enjoy your holiday time, find the joy and the good with family moment even if challenging. That’s the mission I challenge you to. You can always find the joy in things even when you think you can’t.

Come as you are.
Where you are.

(The Quiz is Below)

Take The Quiz & Receive Your Reinforcement Gift 🫶🏽

Take The Quiz: Get Your Reinforcement

Clinical References 📚

• Porges, S. (2017). The Pocket Guide to the Polyvagal Theory

• Barrett, L. F. (2017). How Emotions Are Made

• Siegel, D. J. (2010). Mindsight

• Doidge, N. (2007). The Brain That Changes Itself

• Maté, G. (2022). The Myth of Normal

• Craig, A. D. (2009). Interoception & Insula Cortex studies

“If you avoid the feelings, you unconsciously hand them to your child.”
— Dr. Gabor Maté, The Myth of Normal

Hello Data Collectors!

Before we jump in—let’s be clear:
This is not about blame. This is about naming patterns. Eventually I won’t have to say that anymore, but you know…. society… Over here it’s always about naming the undercurrents, so we can train our perception to take behavioral patterns into consideration. That way we stop recycling them. We all must understand true therapeutic work and self-development comes with discomfort. Naming behaviors and patterns in ourselves does not feel good, but if we don’t name them—we transmit them. In a society— where all we do is cast stones labels, attachments, and reenactment projections.

Sometimes quietly, through sarcasm.
Sometimes loudly, through criticism.

Sometimes even softly, through motherly love or sisterhood.
But always, emotionally, through the mirror of discomfort.

When Your Adult Child Becomes the Mirror

Something quiet happens when your child starts thriving in ways you never could.

They get rest.
They set boundaries.
They stop performing.
They become emotionally regulated.
They make money doing work they love. Not work you told them they needed to do.

Your nervous system? It doesn’t know what to do with the information you’re collecting. That data you are witnessing. This may even trigger feelings of jealousy, envy, that is common. It makes sense but it’s still our accountability to name, and be willing to acknowledge if that jealousy may have unintentionally or unconsciously caused harm. Much of this is never rooted in jealousy, but in the knowing that you didn’t have what your children now have— it didn’t fit the map you were handed as a child.

“That’s not who we are.”
“You didn’t come from that.”
“Must be nice to have the fancy things.”

Those comments, whether said aloud or simmered in silence (these always come with under currents you can feel), are often signs of a deeper ache:

“If you came from me… but you got what I never had… what does that say about me?”

This is the silent under current of grief, but grief that goes unacknowledged becomes guilt.

What do we know about guilt y’all?

It’s one hell of a weapon…
And when untended, often shape shifts into control.

Clinical Lens: Family Systems & The Mirror Wound

Murray Bowen’s Family Systems Theory reminds us:

“Unresolved emotional attachment to family members can lead to emotional cutoff, fusion, or projection.”
— Bowen, Family Therapy in Clinical Practice

When parents experience emotional fusion (blurry boundaries, enmeshment, or over-identification), the growth of a child can feel like a threat rather than a joy. Especially if the child’s growth exceeds the emotional or material capacity the parent had access to. This creates what I call the mirror wound.

You raised a child to do better than you.
But now that they are… you feel:

• Irrelevant

• Resentful

• Small

• Unseen

• Triggered by your own unlived life

And if that grief isn’t processed, it comes out through:

• Nitpicking their habits

• Withholding affirmation

• Questioning their lifestyle

• “Grounding” them emotionally with guilt

• Shaming their ambition or rest

The Crab in the Bucket Effect

This isn’t just personal. It’s generational psychology and in communities that have endured poverty, trauma, or systemic oppression, the family unit can become a site of survival-based identity.

“You don’t get to be that. You didn’t come from that.”
“Don’t act like you’re better than us.”
“You’re not one of them.”

This is the crab-in-the-bucket dynamic pulling back the one who climbs out.

Not because there is hate or malice, but because we as humans do what ever it takes, to avoid shame and the mirror that tells us we are the cause to a lot of our own sufferings. That realization, that mirror— it triggers your feelings of entrapment.

Compassion for the Parents

Let me say this with deep love:

You don’t get to:

• Shrink their world to soothe your guilt

• Project your shame through sarcasm

• Use fear as a way to reassert control

Because if you do?

You’re asking them to shrink back into the version of themselves that fits inside your unfinished healing. That is ego-centricism and for some parents even narcissism

For the Adult Children

If this is happening to you, let me be clear:

You are not crazy.
You are not ungrateful.
You are not arrogant.

You are outgrowing a blueprint that was never designed to support your expansion.

When you are the one who begins to see the inherited patterns, the conditioning, the emotional contracts, the unspoken rules, and you choose to unlearn them. The system often reacts. Not because you are bad or anything like that. But because you are disruptive, because your growth disrupts what lives unquestioned, especially within family dynamics. In families where self-reflection was never practiced, your differentiation can be misread as superiority. Your clarity can trigger narcissistic injury and your boundaries can feel like betrayal. This is because your ascension from the chaos waves of the family exposes what others avoided looking at.

Here’s the part you need to hold okay,

Their discomfort is not your guilt to carry. You are not responsible for buffering their shame.You are not required to shrink to protect their identity. You are the mirror.
What they do with the reflection is not your burden to manage.

REFLECTION PROMPTS FOR PARENTS:

These are not for blame.
These are for repair.

1. What parts of my child’s life trigger emotions I haven’t named in myself?
   (jealousy, regret, shame, fear, grief)

2. Where am I still operating from survival patterns that no longer apply to them?

3. Do I try to re-ground them emotionally when they start to soar? Why?

4. Have I ever confused their growth with my irrelevance? What would happen if I named that honestly?

5. Can I bless their becoming even if it reminds me of what I never got to be?

EXTENDED READING & RESOURCES:

• Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. Jason Aronson.

• Gibson, L. (2015). Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. New Harbinger.

• Maté, G. (2022). The Myth of Normal: Trauma, Illness, and Healing in a Toxic Culture. Avery.

• Hooks, B. (2000). All About Love: New Visions. William Morrow Paperbacks.

• Cozolino, L. (2014). The Neuroscience of Human Relationships. Norton.

CLOSING THOUGHT:

Something here needs to be said plainly, especially to immigrant parents. Many of you tell your children: “We moved here for a better life for you.”
You carry that story like a badge. Like a sacrifice ledger. Like proof of love.

But then something breaks. When your child actually creates a better life: more choice, more voice, more emotional freedom you feel threatened instead of proud. You ask them to suffer the way you did. To stay small in the ways you had to. To carry pressure, guilt, obedience, and silence as a form of loyalty. Then you’re confused when they pull away?

Here’s the challenge:

Why would you ask your children to bleed for a story whose entire promise was that they wouldn’t have to? Why would their ease feel like betrayal when it is the very outcome you claimed to want? Your child’s freedom is not a rejection of your sacrifice.
It is the receipt of it. Their expansion does not erase what you endured.
It completes it.

That’s the pivot.

That’s the healing.

— Sav

Happy Weekend Data Collectors!

We all have moments where we think we’re seeing reality clearly when in fact, we’re just staring into a polished mirror of our own nervous system. Perception Check is a new micro-series of Field Notes I’ll be dropping here on Substack.

They’re short, spicy, and a little uncomfortable, but they’re not here to shame you. They’re here to stretch you. Starting this week, I’ll be posting short-form drops in the Notes section of Substack. Tiny truth bombs for your nervous system, packaged as little letters from me to you.

Every few days, I’ll be delivering what I call Perception Checks:

💭 Cognitive challenges

🧠 Nervous system truths

📚 Clinical and sociological patterns

✨ And the small psychological traps we fall into when we confuse our feelings/ nervous system activity for facts.

WHY PERCEPTION CHECK MATTERS

From a clinical and sociological perspective, we are all navigating the world through layers of personal activation, group identity, and unspoken conditioning.

That means many of our “truths” are actually shaped by:

• Identity fusion (Swann): when we fuse our safety with a label or group

• Emotional reasoning (Beck): when we believe something is true just because it feels true

• Symbolic threat theory (Stephan & Stephan): when we misread someone’s autonomy as personal harm

• Performance rituals (Goffman): when we act out belonging to protect our social standing

Understand— These aren’t flaws, they’re protective strategies. Naming them is not a threat to your safety either. It’s an offering to stretch your capacity. It’s the work of building muscle to hold the weight of nuance. But— if left unchecked, they keep us from developing discernment, emotional regulation, and true autonomy.

📬 HOW THIS WORKS

Each Perception Check is designed to be:

• ✨ Bite-sized (well..maybe big bite sizes😅) — a quick flash of insight or challenge

• 🔍 Backed by research — no influencer fluff here

• 💬 Interactive — you’re invited to comment, reflect, or disagree

• 🔗 Connected to deeper work — each one ties back to my larger series, The Weekly Ledger

WHO IT’S FOR

• People who want to stop reacting and start reflecting

• Therapists, thinkers, feelers, and the beautifully overwhelmed

• Anyone doing inner work who’s sick of the self-help fluff and ready for some psycho-spiritual accountability

🧙🏽‍♀️This isn’t about catching you “being wrong.”

I want to squirrel real quick into a side note. This is something I tell my clients and I’m going to tell you. It’s never about “am I doing this right?”

Trying to perfect-tify everything is the fast track to going mad. I notice many clients come to therapy, zipped up in a glow of need, desperate for the confirmation that they did it “right.” Presenting as the little child turning to parent looking for approval. It’s not about what I think or deem is “right” or “wrong” because truly what is right?

It’s about what is sustainable for YOU and you alone. Not your family, friends, partner, therapist. What’s right for you. Many of us lose sight of that fact simply because we spend too much time around sameness or in shrink-ness (people pleaser mode) that we forget we are a whole individual being capable of holding more than what’s comfortable and familiar.

These Field Notes— Perception Checks, they’re about building the capacity to hold multiple truths without collapsing into control, shame, or superiority. To face discomfort, hold it, and know that despite not agreeing with it— it’s a truth that exists for others whether you like it or not. That’s the training.

Standing strong in the safety you learn to cultivate within yourself, from the interpersonal work YOU put it— well.

That sounds like a gift if you ask me. 😉

Welcome to the mental gym. You’re already in session.🤓

📓Field Note: Perception Check #01 Look out for it!

Feel free to forward, comment, or whisper to your ego gently:

‘We’re just learning here. You’re safe to grow.’

See you out in the wild!

Come as you are, where you are— Sav🫶🏽

📚 References for Clinical Receipts:

• Swann, W. B., Jr., Gómez, Á., Seyle, D. C., Morales, J. F., & Huici, C. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 995–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013668

• Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press.

• Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.

Good Morning Data Collectors,

Let’s talk crayons and relationships…

Most people think relationships fall apart because of compatibility. But the truth?They fall apart because of capacity. You can love your friend.
Adore your parent.
Respect your partner.
Admire your boss.

And still not have the skills to relate with emotional integrity. You can feel deeply, want connection, mean well, and still leak shame, overreact, stonewall, micromanage, withdraw, or control. Why? Because capacity doesn’t start and end with just the intent to want to do something. Capacity is built and later stretched through— integration.

🖍️ Some People Were Born With the Whole Box

Some folks were born with all 64 crayons:

• Patience

• Boundary-setting

• Active listening

• Nervous system regulation

• Embodiment

• Curiosity

• Non-defensiveness etc.

The others?

They may have been born with 12. Some with broken pieces, or even empty crayon wrappers with no crayons in them. But— big but here, folks. Even if you have the full box…

That doesn’t mean you have unlocked the full box.

What I mean by this is— just because you may have been born with the entire box of crayons, it doesn’t mean you were ever taught or modeled how to use them. You don’t get to use the crayons just because you own them. You only get access to use the ones you’ve developed into. Key word: developed.

When we understand this, that’s capacity.
And we don’t talk about it enough.

Where Does This Show Up?

💔 In Friendships & Relationships:

You expect reciprocity. They always cancel last minute. You give nuance. They collapse under discomfort. You initiate repair. They ghost.

Are they bad friends?
Not always. They may have less crayons, or they don’t have access to the ones with skills, patterns of behavior, etc that you need. These people hey may only use their crayons when they feel safe. Which means if you are the only safe container in the friendship, you become the art therapist, the safe house, the soul janitor. Then suddenly, that very friendship feels like parenting. You may even feel that you are now playing the same roles you are casted in the family system. Do a quick mental assess— see what data comes up for you.

💘 In Romantic Relationships:

You crave deep intimacy. They freeze at vulnerability. You try to talk through the hard stuff. They emotionally disappear. You’ve done the work. They haven’t unpacked a thing.

Are they bad partners?
Not necessarily.

They may be using crayons they’ve never developed into or trying to draw connection with crayons they were never taught to use in healthy ways OR were ever modeled how to. This part is crucial.

In partnerships, capacity clashes often look like:

• One person overfunctioning emotionally, the other under-functioning

• One regulating, the other reacting

• One seeking repair, the other avoiding rupture altogether

Sometimes, you’re trying to co-author a love story but only one of you is holding the emotional pen. Just like in family systems, survival patterns from childhood show up in romantic roles.

We project.

We reenact.

We merge.

We flee.

Then, when one partner begins to heal begins to rest, self-regulate, ask for space, or seek co-regulation— the partner still operating from survival may feel abandoned, rejected, or criticized. This isn’t because you’re doing anything wrong. It’s a side effect of writing your love in a language they were never taught to read.
You start coloring with your full set of crayons, and they won’t even look at what you drew not out of malice, but because they literally can’t see it. Their nervous system doesn’t recognize safety that isn’t fused to whatever their blueprint is attached to as “norm.”
So your boundaries feel like betrayal.
Your calm feels like distance.
Your needs feel like demands.

You’re offering connection.
But they’re still wired for protection. This is so common.

This could be you or you could be playing the opposite roll. Either way, we name it here.

So again:
This isn’t about blame.
It’s about understanding that compatibility requires capacity.
These crayons won’t work if they’re locked behind shame, and you can’t get through shame without the ability to surrender to it so it can move through and out of you.

🧬 In Family:

You want mutual adult connection. They’re still talking to your 12-year-old self.
Or worse: you’re still stuck proving something to their 1970s inner child. Family dynamics are full of crayon inflation: People assume they’ve “been through life” so they must have developed crayons. We must understand, surviving trauma isn’t the same as integrating from it. That guilt-gifting doesn’t replace skill-based repair either. A lot of family members aren’t toxic. They’re just unequipped and some of us, because we’ve been to therapy, read the books, done the somatic work. We start assuming our crayon set is the baseline for everyone else.

It’s not.

💼 In the Workplace:

Ever had a boss with all the markers of leadership on paper?
Charisma. Success. Vision. But when conflict arose?

Emotional meltdown.

Gaslighting.

Passive-aggression.

Silence.

Those are locked crayons.

Some people gain power by bypassing development. Through dopamine shortcuts.
They collect titles but never train their tone, wrangle their nervous system, or interrupt the loop. They memorize scripts but never regulate their shame. They exploit systems that reward performance over presence which— look around. This is happening all over the macro level. In many institutions, those people get promoted for the very behaviors that keep them stagnant in the growth department.

🚨 The Bypass Loop

There are people who learned to make enough noise to get what they want without having to develop.

They found the loophole.

• Cry loud enough → people enable you.

• Perform humility → no one challenges you.

• Project competence → no one checks your emotional literacy.

• Create chaos → others overfunction and clean it up.

But underneath that noise…
Is a tantrum, because they know deep down—they’re not using the crayon they were supposed to unlock. So instead of sitting in that shame, they demand another crayon from someone else, and some of you are out here giving people your own crayons and screaming “no access” to everyone else.

They trade development for domination then flip it, decorate it up, and slap the label “leadership, Love” or “just how I am.” Meanwhile you develop BBS, (Bitter B*tch Syndrome) or become full of the infection of resentment. Due to what you tolerated and allowed. I see this all the time. The issue— BBS and resentment are poison for the body it is within. How can you clear that bitterness? How can you clear that resentment? How do you forgive yourself for what you allowed or what you tolerated?

Self-Check: How’s Your Capacity?

It’s easy to point out someone else’s locked crayons.
But here’s the real work:

1. Do I expect others to match my capacity… without checking if I’ve expanded mine?

2. Do I collect emotional tools… but rarely use them when it counts?

3. Are there crayons I’m scared to develop because of how it will stretch my nervous system?

4. Do I hide my locked crayons behind a story, a trauma card, or an aesthetic?

Capacity isn’t just about what you have.
It’s about what you’re willing to practice.

And if we’re honest…
Some of us are still holding onto a box of crayons we refuse to open, because the minute we do, we’ll have to admit we are afraid to color outside the lines.

Reflection Prompts

1. What “crayon” (emotional skill) am I avoiding developing right now? Why?

2. Where have I been bypassing my own growth by using someone else’s crayons?

3. Who in my life do I expect more from than they’ve ever shown capacity to give?

4. Where do I assume someone’s behavior is about me… when it’s actually about their locked crayon set?

5. What skill have I developed that I forget to honor because it’s now “normal” for me?

6. Where am I being emotionally generous—and where am I over-functioning because someone else refuses to learn?

My work is never about blaming people for having less crayons or for being where they are at the start of change. It’s about honoring the process of unlocking the necessary skills we need in order to take accountability for our role in the dynamics we are apart of.

Even if it’s one dull crayon at a time.

✨ Because the real masterpiece?
Isn’t in the set you were born with.
It’s in what you learned to draw— with the ones you developed.

✨Welcome Paid Sanctuary Members.✨

Please be sure to fill out the questionnaire that is in your welcome email. This allows me to assess where you are, what you are currently holding. Allowing me to tailor my educational content & lecture halls to your needs.

Be on the lookout in the next few days where I will post dates for our first live Q&A via Substack. 🥳 So excited to meet you all.

If you would like to join the Sanctuary you can do join the membership here.

Until next time.

Come as you are, where you are. — Sav

The issue today is cheating isn’t just something people fear; it’s marketed.

Reality TV thrives on it. Songs glorify it. Algorithms amplify it. Whats occuring within our nervous systems is comfortability. Now we are getting use to it despite it causing distress— developing fluentcy in suspicion.

We scroll through betrayal and call it entertainment, so many are down to share the chisme (gossip) of others and wonder why love feels unsafe?

This topic squirrels my mind into the ColdPlay kiss cam scandal from this summer.

The viral couple that was having an affair and the amount of people it hit because Coldplay pointed it out live. The thing is….Had the couple not even moved, done nothing, acted naturally for a kiss cam—no one would have even noticed. What’s ironic is so many publicly shamed these people while they, down here in their lived reality. Have multiple fires running wild through their own lives, families, and relationships.

I work with clients every day living two lives.

Having affairs.

Cheating. Lying. Living double lives. Honestly, I think it’s for the thrill. We get addicted to those waves. Especially if we were born or even grew up riding within them. We start getting selective as a society about who we choose to shame publicly for doing something many are currently participating in. See how we as society do this? Cherry-pick what to be mad at to avoid our own internal shame.

Affect Theory & Media Conditioning

Repeated exposure to media that glorifies infidelity, secrecy, or love triangles has been shown to normalize deceptive behavior and reduce relationship satisfaction over time (Nathanson, 1992; Reinecke & Oliver, 2017). Dr. Donald Nathanson’s Affect Theory explains that chronic exposure to stimulating, high‑drama content creates a baseline of emotional arousal that real‑life intimacy can’t match. As a result, people feel “bored” in healthy relationships and scan for the dopamine spikes found in dysfunction.

Let me tell you. All my trauma ladies— many of you are praying for a healthy man and finally have one. And now you’re finding anything to fixate on to be upset about and it’s usually sex, the way he dresses, but most importantly boredom.

Social Learning & Cheating as Entertainment

According to Social Learning Theory (Bandura, 1977), we don’t just watch behavior, we absorb it. Especially when it’s rewarded with attention, likes, and viral status. In today’s culture, cheating isn’t always framed as a betrayal—it’s a plot twist. A cliffhanger. A trending topic. The more we consume these storylines, the more they imprint into our subconscious

Over time, betrayal becomes familiar.

Pop quiz! What do we know about our nervous system? What have we been learning while on our safari?

That what’s familiar for the nervous system? Feels true.

So even when someone is being honest with us, our nervous system doesn’t trust it. We default to suspicion. Even if they are saying something positive. Not because there’s any evidence to confirm it except our own bias, but because we’ve been trained by the macro level to expect the twist. Macro level? Echo chambers of the internet, communities, societal norms, culture, etc.

🧙🏽‍♀️Wizard Cue: If your mirror neurons binge-watch betrayal, your relationships will start to feel like plot lines of those same dynamics. Not partnerships.

See how micro level behaviors condition perception?

We were never meant to live inside other people’s breakups, scandals, or intimate moments. But now? We almost expect and even demand that people hand those moments over. We call it “vulnerability,” but what we really mean is emotional access and some of us feel “unsafe” if we’re not given it. Today, due to influencers online showing us everything, we’ve grown entitled to intimacy that doesn’t belong to us. I’m seeing it more and more: a lot of us are reenacting these dramas the same way little kids reenact phone conversations—mimicking what we see the adults do with the cell phone.

The difference? We’re not playing pretend.

We’re reenacting the emotional scripts we’ve absorbed, without even realizing it. And often, we’re doing it inside our own relationships.

🧙🏽‍♀️ ✨WIZARD CUE: Self Check

Look at the last five posts, songs, or shows you consumed. What emotion do they teach your body to expect— connection, chaos, betrayal, hope?

What is your algorithm training your nervous system to look for? To scan for? To accuse your partner of?

Friday Reflection: Cognitive Feng Shui Edition

1. As you head into the weekend whether you’re surrounded by people or sitting in sacred solitude. Have a go at a little cognitive cleanup.

2. What beliefs about love, safety, and partnership are still living rent-free in your mental blueprint?

3. Are they serving you? Or are they just familiar?

4. What would happen if those feelings and thoughts were not there. What else would you mind focus on?

This is your invitation to practice a little cognitive restructuring:

Rearrange the furniture of your mind so it actually fits the relationship you want to live in not the one you were handed.

Also understand in order to receive the very love you crave. You have to become the person that can receive it.

Ask yourself:

1. What did I inherit as “truth” about relationships?

2. Who taught me what love is supposed to feel like?

3. Do I feel safe with safety? Or do I still crave the chaos?

At the end of the day, distrust isn’t a personality trait…it’s a conditioning pattern. Think about it, how would we have known to distrust in the first place? Where would we have known it was distrust or that there was anything but distrust that existed? Also, if all you know is distrust do you even know the version of you on the receiving end of loyalty?

Until next time Data Collectors.

Let me know what came up for you this time.

Come as you are where you are.

— Sav 🫶🏽

📚 References (Used in This Article)

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‑Hall.

Nathanson, D. L. (1992). Shame and pride: Affect, sex, and the birth of the self. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

Reinecke, L., & Oliver, M. B. (2017). The Routledge handbook of media use and well‑being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects. New York, NY: Routledge.

Further Reading & Exploration

Want to go deeper? Here are 3 powerful books that explore how media, nervous systems, and attachment conditioning collide:

Deviced by Doreen Dodgen‑Magee (2019)

→ Explores how overstimulation rewires emotional baselines and sabotages relational satisfaction.

The Neuroscience of Human Relationships by Louis Cozolino (2nd Ed., 2014)

→ A beautiful breakdown of how our brains learn intimacy and why safety sometimes feels boring when we’re used to chaos.

Stolen Focus by Johann Hari (2022)

→ Offers a cultural lens on attention loops, digital hijacking, and how overstimulation chips away at clarity, trust, and connection.